Read on Twitter
My dudes, I know Lynch seemed angry, but he did not "crush" DeJoy.
He wasted his 5 minutes making a speech about the Pony Express. When DeJoy said he wouldn't put the machines back, all that was left was for Lynch to shout at him.
No follow up. No examination. Just grandstanding
He wasted his 5 minutes making a speech about the Pony Express. When DeJoy said he wouldn't put the machines back, all that was left was for Lynch to shout at him.
No follow up. No examination. Just grandstanding
Here's how that should have sounded:
* Sorting machines do [whatever] is that correct?
* In fact the number of machines has increased every year since [X]?
* B/c they're efficient right? Here are [various] experts calling sorting machines efficient. Are these experts wrong?
* Sorting machines do [whatever] is that correct?
* In fact the number of machines has increased every year since [X]?
* B/c they're efficient right? Here are [various] experts calling sorting machines efficient. Are these experts wrong?
* No other PMG has tried to decrease efficiency in the post office before an election, is that correct?
* Is it your testimony that you want the post office to be less efficient?
* Is it your testimony that you only want the post office to be less efficient for the election?
* Is it your testimony that you want the post office to be less efficient?
* Is it your testimony that you only want the post office to be less efficient for the election?
* Well, Mr. DeJoy, if your are not trying to decrease the efficiency of the post office ahead of the general election, will you put the sorting machines back as the experts suggest?
* No? Mr. Dejoy, why are you tampering with the efficiency of the post office before the election?
* No? Mr. Dejoy, why are you tampering with the efficiency of the post office before the election?
THAT TAKES ABOUT FIVE MINUTES.
