A Public Health Perspective on the Potential Harms of #COVID19 #Elimination (my first thread)

I have provided a reference for each post which I think should be the standard moving forward for public health/clinical posts for @Twitter

Set up as assumptions and reality
Assumption: Using a forecasting model to guide intervention strategies is appropriate. A single counterfactual (ie, the hammer) vs exponential epidemic growth
Reality: Mathematical models guiding programs should provide different scenarios, competing health risks, and uncertainty
Assumption: All efforts to prevent and mitigate COVID-19 will be associated with a net gain in healthy years of lives saved

Reality: Multiple levels of prevention services are interrupted in the context of lockdowns with predictable and grave associated morbidity and mortality
Assumption: Parameterizing transmission dynamics of COVID-19 with same numbers globally was appropriate

Reality: Heterogeneity in transmission by communities, neighborhoods, cities, countries, and regions has defined this and other lipid-enveloped RNA respiratory viruses.
Assumption: The only competing consideration is the economy and with elimination, the economy rebounds
Reality: Interrupting diagnostic, prevention, and treatment services has consequences related to specific existing causes of mortality with those most marginalized most affected
Assumption: The lockdown protects all

Reality: COVID-19 has exposed many preexisting inequities around the world that result in suboptimal living & working conditions. Lockdowns have reinforced socioeconomic disparities given it represents a regressive (non-adaptive) approach.
Assumption: No chance to prepare for how best to implement a lockdown. Ie, shut it down.

Reality: Documents describe empathetic implementation, adaptive strategies responsive to emerging data, protections to avoid discrimination and undue harms and provision of equitable support
Assumption: COVID-19 is unprecedented, and we had no alternative

Reality: There has been decades of preparation for respiratory pandemics, studying individual-level determinants of acquisition and transmission, network-level dynamics, and structural factors
For COVID-19, disparities in transmission dynamics were evident early with socioeconomic inequities a common and global theme

Ie, occupational acquisition risks and household transmission risks, transmission networks, and inequities, and structural racism.
Moving forward necessitates application of an equity lens in terms of how to address the determinants observed with empathy -- optimizing IPAC, supporting people not to work, minimizing household transmission with housing support, facilitating access to health care for everyone.
None of this is cheap, but it is feasible. Then again, social collapse isn't cheap either.

The next wave of COVID-19 will start soon in most places, and the next major pandemic will happen during the 2020s.

We need to do better.
You can follow @sdbaral.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: