Read on Twitter
Support or rejection must be based on the facts and not on fiction. Charvaka Management: Applicable Style of Organisational Management: Volume ... https://www.amazon.in/dp/1541370813/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_awdb_btf_t1_x_59CpFbB5BBZ0G via @amazonIN
Book is here and book isn't here. Here is common in both. Drashta is there which talks about asti - base of Vedic literature /Indian philosophy. https://twitter.com/KanjamB/status/1296149548742504448?s=19
https://twitter.com/ShaswataChatte6/status/1296151076240936965?s=19
https://twitter.com/ShaswataChatte6/status/1296151076240936965?s=19
Western atheism, God etc are different. Ishwar & bhagvan hv own meaning. Separate videos on them :- Charvaka philosophy https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJT7TfwHi35GfMgFe2zLIyNsH7K134uQH
चार्वाक दर्शन के अधिकारिक सुत्रों को खोले बिना कहना उचित नहीं। उसने विरोध किया उनका जो :- बेचहिं बेदु धरमु दुहि लेहीं। पिसुन पराय पाप कहि देहीं॥ कपटी कुटिल कलहप्रिय क्रोधी। बेद बिदूषक बिस्व बिरोधी ।।
@BeingCentred @Hinduism_Ebooks @mrugtrushna @Numberline12 @VedicWisdom1 @ArunKum16852133 @prasadsureddy @Ventilator_Ishq
https://twitter.com/AkshayChaitanya/status/1256398114153533447?s=19
All the established schools of Indian philosophy have inner link. Armchair activists and net experts won't experience easily.
All the established schools of Indian philosophy have inner link. Armchair activists and net experts won't experience easily.
@Arjun_Mehar @JitendraSpeaks you're right. Till 2009 the official sutras of charvakaphilosophy were not decoded. See the whole thread. चार्वाक दर्शन के अधिकारिक सुत्रों को खोले बिना कहना उचित नहीं पर हुवा वही।
@amritbakhshy you've raised a good point, both happy and stress hormone are needed. Only one creates havoc.
@MorrisseyHelena your view on Indian philosophy is an eye opener. https://twitter.com/MorrisseyHelena/status/1296551414148345859?s=19
Kindle edition https://images.app.goo.gl/VmBuWyN2QjXgeZop6
@modified_hindu
विवेचना हेतु साधुवाद। वेद कोई पुस्तक नहीं जिसका खंडन मंडन हो सके। और न गॉड की पाश्चात्य अवधारणा यहाँ के भगवान ईश्वर से मिलती है। इन दोनों का अर्थ तक अलग है। https://twitter.com/modified_hindu/status/1302299262160531456?s=19
विवेचना हेतु साधुवाद। वेद कोई पुस्तक नहीं जिसका खंडन मंडन हो सके। और न गॉड की पाश्चात्य अवधारणा यहाँ के भगवान ईश्वर से मिलती है। इन दोनों का अर्थ तक अलग है। https://twitter.com/modified_hindu/status/1302299262160531456?s=19
@BhagwaanUvacha good analysis. Charvaka is used as weapon to satisfy personal agenda. So called followers have nothing to do with the official sutras, decoding, sangati. And support from vedic literature is faraway
Just by keeping the name charvaka or running a channel or cashing own agenda doesn't mean that person studied this school properly. Have interacted with many but all are either net experts or armchair activists or just trying to complete the syllabus.
तथाकथित आचार्यों ने अपने प्रायोजक या व्यक्तिगत मान्यता या संप्रदायों के ऐनक से इसे ऊपरी स्तर से देखा और नकार दिया। चार्वाक न दलित दर्शन है, न किसी वर्ण का विरोधी और न गीतादि विरोधी। जानकर वैसा दिखलाया जा रहा है।
All the 9 schools of Indian philosophy are linked and follows law of utility but one must study them in an order before jumping. None is shallow though charvaka is presented in that way. Concept Self is present all of them.
Armchair activists want to compare Indian philosophy with science without studying all the schools. Study, reasoning and experience is the formula and only one can't help. Only fools will follow one.
@maidros78
https://twitter.com/maidros78/status/1303670207253110784?s=19
You've raised a good point. Western God is different from bhagvan and ishwar.
Chanakya took material from charvaka Philosophy. https://twitter.com/shubkrishna/status/1303884696409890817?s=19
https://twitter.com/maidros78/status/1303670207253110784?s=19
You've raised a good point. Western God is different from bhagvan and ishwar.
Chanakya took material from charvaka Philosophy. https://twitter.com/shubkrishna/status/1303884696409890817?s=19
@maidros78 if possible do share the verse. Here or via DM. And regarding heaven, etc, implied meaning - fruits of action aren't permanent. Already decoded and said the implied meaning. It isn't the case of personal interpretation. @jayarevathi
Just for fashion people call themself follower of charvaka Philosophy and atheist without knowing the ground reality. https://twitter.com/Iblis_Luci_Mahi/status/1307902947703967744?s=19
