“Title VI is aimed at strengthening the interests of the United States in a complex global environment. It is imperative that students are presented with fact-based information, not agitprop with agendas quite different from Congress and the United States Government.”
As Lamborn explains in his letter to Secretary DeVos, some of the events hosted by Berkeley last year “maliciously attempted to portray the democracy of Israel in a negative light." According to Lamborn, this is not something that Title VI recipients should be permitted to do.
No problem, right? Well, the EO instructs the Dept. of Ed to consider the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism when evaluating whether Title IX has been violated. The IHRA, in turn, cites criticism of Israel as one kind of potential anti-Semitic speech.

https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/working-definition-antisemitism
This seems to be what Lamborn is doing. Since Berkeley's CMES program takes Title VI funding, the Congressman is saying that it needs to either teach more pro-Israel content or forfeit the money. Which, quite obviously, is a massive threat to academic freedom!
You can follow @JeffreyASachs.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: