How about an analytical walthrough of this thread? Let& #39;s go

TW // Queerphobia https://twitter.com/desdeestrellas/status/1293958166275919876">https://twitter.com/desdeestr...

Starting with definitions? Here& #39;s the cambridge online definition of fetishism, from which the fetishization word is derived. Is the original meaning of "fetishism" inherently negative? No. Therefore giving a negative meaning to the word is a recent-
https://twitter.com/desdeestrellas/status/1293958177462132736?s=19">https://twitter.com/desdeestr...

Interpretation. What does this more recent interpretation suggests? That depicting "inaccurate" queer characters (according to subjective standards as we& #39;ll later see) is fetishization of real life queer people. "Objectification" is an already existing synonym to "fetishization".

According to this definition, objectification is the process of turning a person into an object. Except an entire portion of the fetishization discourse (FD) is dedicated to "fetishization of characters". Can a real person be fetishized? Absolutely. Can a fictional

Character be fetishized? Absolutely not, for a character never had rights, feelings or opinions of their own. The person who crafted the character does, and designs the characters according to their own, or doesn& #39;t.

Thread broke here is the next part https://twitter.com/Patallyry/status/1294383833379418113?s=19">https://twitter.com/Patallyry...