Since my argument according to you is "refuted" which basically means that you dont want to accept it but anyways.
your books are surprisingly full with the burning of Hazrat Fatima's (ASWS) house. https://twitter.com/TheAynGhayn/status/1294224742350761985

Musnaf of Imam Ibn Abi Shebah, Volume 7 page 432 Tradition 37045
al Imama wa al Siyasa pages 18-30 Dhikr Bayya Abu Bakr
Tareekh Abul Fida Volume 1 page 156 Dhikr bayya Abu Bakr
History of al-Tabari, Volume 9 page 187
al-Istiab, by Ibn Abd al-Barr Volume 1 page 246 Dhikr

Abdullah in Abi Quhafa
Sharh ibn al Hadeed Volume 1 page 157
Al Mihal wa al Nihal Volume 1 page 77, Dhikr Nizameeya
Muruj adh-Dhahab by Abd al-Hasan Ali ibn al-Husayn al Masudi Volume 3 page 198
Izalat ul Khifa by Muhaddith Shah Waliyullah Dehlavi

Volume 2 page 226 (Urdu translation, Qur’an Mehal publishers, Karachi)
Tareekh Kamil by Ibn Atheer Volume 11 page 113
Tareekh Ahmadi by Ahmad Husayn Khan pages 111-112
Tauhfa Ithna Ashari, by al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz Dehlavi page 292 Dhikr Muthain Umar

Al Murthada by Hafidh Abdul Rahman al Hanafi page 45 (Amritsar edition)
Kanz al Ummal, Volume 2 page 184 (Egypt).
Tahqeeq Mubashraab Sunni page 110 by Maulana Waheedudin Khan al Hanafi
Ansar Ashraf, by al-Baladhuri, v1, pp 582-586
Tareekh Ya’qubi, v2, p116

Qurat al-Aynayn fi Tafdhil al-Shaykhayn by Shah Waliyullah Dehlavi, page 88
al Faruq, Volume 1 page 92 Dhikr Saqeefa Bani Sa’ada
Ruh al Mustafai Volume 3 page 36
Iqd al Fareed, Volume 3 page 273

The reference I've previously provided in Musnaf of Imam Ibn Abi Shebah, Volume 7 page 432 Tradition 37045
All the narrators are authentic as they are the narrators of Sahih Bukhari & Sahih Muslim. Muhammad bin Bashir: Imam Al-Dhahabi said: ‘Thabt’ (Al-Kaashif, v2 p159), Imam

Ibn Hajar Asqalani said: ‘Thiqa’ (Taqrib al-Tahdib, v2 p58). Ubaidllah bin Umar: Al-Dhahabi said: ‘Thabt’ (Al-Kaashif, v1 p685), Ibn Hajar Asqalani said: ‘Thiqa Thabt’ (Taqrib al-Tahdib, v1 p637). Zaid bin Aslam: Al-Dhahabi said: ‘Hujja’ (Siar alam alnubala, v5 p316), Imam Ibn

Hajar Asqalani said: ‘Thiqa’ (Taqrib al-Tahdib, v1 p326). Aslam al-Qurashi (the slave of Umar): Al-Dhahabi said: ‘Faqih, Imam’ (Siar alam alnubala, v4 p98), Ibn Hajar Asqalani said: ‘Thiqa’ (Taqrib al-Tahdib, v1 p88).

Qeraa fi kutub al-Aqaed, by Farhan Hassan al-Maliki, page 52

This reference places Umar at the scene, it shows that he was acting in the capacity of an agent for the newly installed Khalifah and evidences his use of threats to set fire to the home of Fatima (as). It evidences the complete disregard that he had for the daughter of Prophet

Other Sunni sources might not be as authentic in terms of chains as Musnaf but they should in no way be discounted for they place Umar at the crime scene and evidence his conduct on that fateful day. Crucially they corroborate the authentic Musnaf tradition.

Abu Muhammad Abdullah bin Muslim bin Qutaybah (d. 276 Hijri) who in his famous book al Imama wa al Siyasa pages 18-28 states as follows:

Sunni historian Abul Fida on the attack on the house of Fatima (as) recorded the event, in a very cautious tone, but as a scholar of integrity and honesty he has refused to cover up history and has still acknowledged that the event took place and Umar threatened to burn Fatima

Then Abu Bakr sent Umar bin Khattab to Ali and his companions with the objective that those ‘people gathered in the house of Fatima come out, and that if anyone objects to coming out then you should fight them’. Then Umar approached with fire in his hands to set the house ablaze.

At this point Fatima approached and said: ‘ O son of Khattab, would do you dare?’ Do you wish to set my home on fire?’ Umar said: ‘Yes, unless if you give bayya to Abu Bakr and enter into that which the majority of the Ummah have agreed to.’
Tareekh Abul Fida [Arabic], page 235

Tareekh Abul Fida, Urdu translation by Maulana Karrem’ud Deen al Hanafi, pages 177-179
It again evidences Umar making threats to set fire to the home,

If Ali (as) did not give bayya, the only difference is this reference mentions him carrying fire, that shows that he meant business. There is no contradiction here it merely demonstrates that Umar came equipped with the tools to carry out the threat if his demands were not met.

Ibn Abd Rabbah in his book Iqd al Fareed, Volume 3 page 273 states

We are sure that Umar did not simply go to the home of Sayyida Fatima (as) of his own accord. He was clearly carrying out instructions, and this reference confirms that he was acting on the orders of Abu Bakr. Like Abu’l Fida it confirms Umar came equipped with fire,

thus evidencing his willingness to take extreme measures to carry through his desire that bayya be given to Abu Bakr. Like the previous references this confirms that the motive was to secure bayya for Abu Bakr, so it corroborates the previous texts.

The most renowned Sunni historian Ibn Jareer al Tabari also recorded this event. We read in al Tabari (English translation), Volume 9 page 187

Just like the previous references Tabari highlights threats issued outside the home of Sayyida Fatima (as) if bayya is not administered to Abu Bakr. It is in complete conformity with the authentic tradition of Ibn Abi Shaybah. Whilst Ibn Abu Shaybah’s narrative takes events from

the threats to bayya, the reaction of Ibn Zubayr and his being seized upon should not be deemed a contradiction. This merely adds more flesh to the bones of the narrative of Ibn Abu Shaybah. It would not be illogical to believe that the threats courted the sort of reaction made

by Ibn Zubayr, but the fact of the matter is Umar came with back up ready to apprehend anyone that took issue with his threats.

If we read these five supporting references alongside the authentic reference of Ibn Abi Shaybah, then Umar’s conduct at the home of Sayyida Fatima (as) is proven beyond all reasonable doubt. None of these references is at variance with another, rather two common facts can be

located in all of them, namely that Umar:

threatened to set fire to the home of Sayyida Fatima (as)
justified his conduct on the basis that Maula Ali (as) and his supporters had failed to give bayya to Abu Bakr

The matter did just not end there. If that was not bad enough we also know that the home of Sayyida Fatima (as) was raided by the newly formed state. al-Hafiz Diya al-Din Muhammad ibn al-Wahid al-Maqdisi (d. 643 H) in his authority work al-Ahadith al-Mukhtarat, Volume 1 page 88

Ibn Tamiyah also admitted that Abu Bakr broke into Lady Fatima’s house:

“He broke into the house to see if there was some thing of Allah’s money to distribute it or give it to those who deserved it”
Minhaj al-Sunnah, Volume 8 page 291

Whilst the timing of this event is not clear from the Sunni sources our contention is that there is a nexus between Umar’s threats and the raid on the house, we after all know that Imam Ali (as) had refused to come out. The physical raid on the home of Sayyida Fatima (as) wherein

according to Ibn Tamiyah illegally held possessions were being hoarded must have followed on from this refusal. It is logical that these episodes were interlinked, the event started out with Umar issuing threats, and ended with the house being raided, possession being taken