No sir, it is incorrect.There is a line of kings mentioned that amounts to 1400 years that is missing. Let me start dismantling the lies../1 https://twitter.com/Bharathgyan/status/1294226548099174400

The Western scholars hv not only bungled facts & tampered with texts,they even went on hurling abuse at our ancient historians & sages.
Long Before Kota Venkatachelam,Prof.M.Troyer raised his voice of protest against modern historians. Mr.TS Narayana Sastry also was another./2

Chandragupta Maurya lived in 1534 BC but was brought down to 323 BC to coincide with Alexander of 326 BC.This is the faking of Indian history.t was Gupta Chandragupta who was contemporary of Alexander and not Maurya Chandragupta. Max Muller did this to suit Greek chronology../3

Jones was determined to reduce the antiquity of Indian history. He fixed the chronology of the different dynasties in an arbitrary way.
Prof.M.Troyar who translated Kalhana's Rajatarangini pointed out the necessity to follow Yudhishtira era of 3138 BC../4

Prof Troyar insisted on identifying Alexander's Chandragupta with Gupta Chandragupta but in vain.Kota Venkatachalam collected astronomical evidence supporting Kali Era.Kota Venkat exposed reasons tht prompted Westerners to discard puranic chronology+ the Kali Era of 3102 BC../5

The antiquity of Indian history was reduced by 12 centuries by identitying Chandragupta Maurya of 1534 BC with Gupta Chandragupta of 323 BC. Max Muller's plan was to reduce Indian chronology to suit Greek chronology. We get the Aihole inscription of Pulekesin II../6

..mentioning Yudhishtira Saka of 3109 BC and Saka Era of 550 BC. Ravi Kirthi built a Jain temple in 5 BC & both Kalidasa & Bharavi must have lived before that date in 57 BC during Vikramaditya's time. Reigning periods of 3 contemporary kingdoms of Nepal, Magadha and Kashmir../7

..refer to Kali Era of 3102 BC & Mahabharata war of 3138 BC. Even Jones had given the chronology of dynasties till end of Ashoka as given in Bhagavata PuraNa. But he did not adopt in toto. It is our duty as Hindus to rescue our history from the distortions & rape committed by../8

..the colonialists & their neo-colonial successors.India has sufficient historical evidence in the following 12 records. 1) Vishnu Purana 4th Amsa. 2) Bhavishyothara Purana 3) Kaliyuga Raja Vrintanta (giving a fairly detailed account of Andhra and subsequent Gupta dynasty),../9

4) Rajatarangini of Kalhana 5) Chach-nama (almost accurate account of Sind history) 6) Gauda-Vaho 7) Nepala Raja Vamsavali 8) Jain Patvalis 9) Silasanas 10) Tamra-saasanas (Stone+copper plate inscriptions 11) Prasatis (eg.Samudhragupta's Iron Pillar) 12) Various Mutt records../10

It is sacrilege to discard puranas. Besides there are histories like Harsha Charitha of Bana.
It is a pity that all old records of the world except that of India were given credence to in computing our history by secular indologists.../11

All the vile historians didnt compile our history independently but have drawn evidence only from Puranas while twisting 2 suit their view.
Sir William Jones who swallowed the 1200 years of history between Chandragupta Maurya and Gupta Chadragupta acknowedges Puranas!../12

It is clear that without Puranas that even the secular distortions could not have a basis. Vie on those who poo-poo our Puranas!

U have to question why the indologists try to distance themselves from Puranas. The answer is to conform to the biblical idea!../13

This hist has been recorded & preserved safe and pure in the ithihaasas and puraanas, our historical ancient treatises. This great stretch of historical life has been divided into the different Manvantharas. In the current Brahma kalpa we are now in the time of the 7th Manu../14

195,58,85,113 yrs after the beginning of creation. The period of six Manus, each 30,67,24,000 yrs long hv been left behind, and in the period of the 7th Manu Vaivasvat, 27 Mahayugas have passed away, each of 43,20,000 years duration. In the 28th Mahayuga of Vaivasvatha Manu,../15

the Krita, Treta, Dwapara yugas together account for 38,88,000 years and towards the end of Dwapara, 36 years before the commencement of the current Kali yuga there took place the Great Mahabharata War.../16

We may designate as ancient period of our hist, the period from the commencement of the Vaivasvata manvanthara to the beginning of its 28th Mahayuga to the end of the Dwapara yuga & the Mahabharata War which occured thereabouts as the medieval period of our country's history../17

The period from MB War, up to date, will then ..constitute the modern age in our history. The 'very ancient period' would cover from the time of creation to the 7th Manu.
"Ancient Period" would cover from the beginning of the 7th Manvanthara to end of 27th Mahayuga therein../18

"Medieval Period" would be the beginning of the 28th Mahayuga to the end of Mahabharata War ie. 36 years before Kali.
With regard to the modern period of our history from the time of Mahabharata war ie. 36 years before Kali started - - we find mentioned in our Puranas,../19

..not only the prominent royal dynasties which gained ascendancy & the total duration of their reigns, but also the names of the several kings of each dynasty in order and the duration of the reign of each king. We are used to take the history of Imperial Magadha for the hist/20