Read on Twitter
This is a really weird story that doesn’t acknowledge that Obama changed the definition of “showerhead” in 2010. https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2020-08-12/trump-to-relax-rules-for-showers-after-complaining-about-flow-kdrlkqzh
...and as far as I can tell, the AP never mentioned it when Obama redefined "showerhead" in order to outlaw some shower fixtures. Yet it's a big deal when Trump undoes it. It's the standard asymmetry in coverage of regulation.. https://apnews.com/083ef5555ef82c015e2f37f1822c0d78
...it's always normal and expected when regulations go up--even if they're going up without statutory authority--and it's always radical when regulations go down.
I mean you could've written 'rich people who get to have multiple showerheads used to get more water than you do, and now Trump wants to bring that back'
But instead they write "LOL, redefining showerhead!"
"Undoing a 1992 law signed by a Republican!"
and "how petty! showers!"
But instead they write "LOL, redefining showerhead!"
"Undoing a 1992 law signed by a Republican!"
and "how petty! showers!"
