Read on Twitter
[thread] 1 of 2
I& #39;ve been waiting to see if someone could isolate aerosol-sourced viable SARS-CoV-2 from an environment and culture it. This needs replication by independent parties.
These results don& #39;t look good for the masks and distancing advocates. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395v1">https://www.medrxiv.org/content/1...
I& #39;ve been waiting to see if someone could isolate aerosol-sourced viable SARS-CoV-2 from an environment and culture it. This needs replication by independent parties.
These results don& #39;t look good for the masks and distancing advocates. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395v1">https://www.medrxiv.org/content/1...
2 of 2
Results like this should have been obtained and replicated before any discussion of mask mandates ever started. But, we don& #39;t do things like that in a world where "the science" has replaced the scientific method.
Results like this should have been obtained and replicated before any discussion of mask mandates ever started. But, we don& #39;t do things like that in a world where "the science" has replaced the scientific method.
Another interesting thing from this study is that the authors previously failed to culture SARS-CoV-2 because it was overrun by common respiratory viruses in the samples. That sort of tarnishes the OMG-COVID-SUPER-PLAGUE™ media narrative a bit. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395v1">https://www.medrxiv.org/content/1...
