Read on Twitter
[thread] 1 of 2
I've been waiting to see if someone could isolate aerosol-sourced viable SARS-CoV-2 from an environment and culture it. This needs replication by independent parties.
These results don't look good for the masks and distancing advocates. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395v1
I've been waiting to see if someone could isolate aerosol-sourced viable SARS-CoV-2 from an environment and culture it. This needs replication by independent parties.
These results don't look good for the masks and distancing advocates. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395v1
2 of 2
Results like this should have been obtained and replicated before any discussion of mask mandates ever started. But, we don't do things like that in a world where "the science" has replaced the scientific method.
Results like this should have been obtained and replicated before any discussion of mask mandates ever started. But, we don't do things like that in a world where "the science" has replaced the scientific method.
Another interesting thing from this study is that the authors previously failed to culture SARS-CoV-2 because it was overrun by common respiratory viruses in the samples. That sort of tarnishes the OMG-COVID-SUPER-PLAGUE™ media narrative a bit. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395v1
