Read on Twitter
Dear @jack:
Why did @Twitter’s Censorship Department suspend conservative attorney @Yoder_Esqq’s account?
What part of his tweet below is false?
Why did @Twitter’s Censorship Department suspend conservative attorney @Yoder_Esqq’s account?
What part of his tweet below is false?
Dear @NickPacilio:
Were you behind @Twitter’s decision to suspend conservative attorney @Yoder_Esqq? https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harriss-former-press-secretary-is-twitters-top-censor/">https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/ka...
Were you behind @Twitter’s decision to suspend conservative attorney @Yoder_Esqq? https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harriss-former-press-secretary-is-twitters-top-censor/">https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/ka...
Here were the pictures that @Yoder_Esqq posted:
For 10 years, I was a litigator in Colorado — and I have a lot of experience with issues involving elections.
If the primary voter didn’t receive a secrecy sleeve for the primary ballot, anyone can see from the outer envelope whether that mail-in ballot is R, D, or Unaffiliated.
If the primary voter didn’t receive a secrecy sleeve for the primary ballot, anyone can see from the outer envelope whether that mail-in ballot is R, D, or Unaffiliated.
Liberal Big Tech monopolists & billionaires think they serve as the ultimate arbiters of “truth”—our “protectors.”
Truly narcissistic & scary.
Even if you believe someone is wrong, how is it acceptable to censor?
And why is @NickPacilio, @KamalaHarris’s former aide, in charge?
Truly narcissistic & scary.
Even if you believe someone is wrong, how is it acceptable to censor?
And why is @NickPacilio, @KamalaHarris’s former aide, in charge?
Trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolies claim they need Uncle Sam’s coddling & protection from lawsuits, in the form of an out-of-date statute called Section 230 (from 1996).
And then these Big Tech bullies target & silence conservatives.
@The_IAP says it’s time to reboot Big Tech.
And then these Big Tech bullies target & silence conservatives.
@The_IAP says it’s time to reboot Big Tech.
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is outdated & contains corporate handouts, such that Big Tech profits from human-sex trafficking, revenge-porn, the opioid epidemic and drug addiction, terrorism, and other forms of human misery. Do conservatives support this?
Trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolies & their (liberal) billionaire bosses keep getting fatter
@The_IAP‘s fixes
1. End Antitrust Amnesty
2. Upgrade Sect 230 Immunity, so Uncle Sam doesn’t keep coddling Big Tech so they can censor conservatives
3. Personal data=personal property
@The_IAP‘s fixes
1. End Antitrust Amnesty
2. Upgrade Sect 230 Immunity, so Uncle Sam doesn’t keep coddling Big Tech so they can censor conservatives
3. Personal data=personal property
Antitrust is both civil and criminal law enforcement.
Yes, LAW ENFORCEMENT — not regulation.
Do conservatives still believe in law enforcement?
Conservatives don’t believe in amnesty or Sanctuary Swamps, do they?
#EndAntitrustAmnesty
#DrainSanctuarySwamp
Yes, LAW ENFORCEMENT — not regulation.
Do conservatives still believe in law enforcement?
Conservatives don’t believe in amnesty or Sanctuary Swamps, do they?
#EndAntitrustAmnesty
#DrainSanctuarySwamp
Big Tech is feeding chickens to the reptiles in the DC Swamp, to satiate the appetite for targeted antitrust enforcement against Big Tech’s most egregious actors. The amnesty & Sanctuary Swamp that Big Tech has bought is great for the ruling class, but not for the rest of America
Many “conservative” DC-establishment types and other insiders take handouts from the liberals running Big Tech — while taking pot shots at real conservatives who are fed up with Big Tech’s censorship and bullying.
1. Antitrust Law Enforcement — not Antitrust Amnesty
2. End Uncle Sam’s coddling of trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolies and their (liberal) billionaire bosses by upgrading Section 230 immunity
3. Treat users’ personal data as their personal property https://www.theiap.org/key-issues ">https://www.theiap.org/key-issue...
2. End Uncle Sam’s coddling of trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolies and their (liberal) billionaire bosses by upgrading Section 230 immunity
3. Treat users’ personal data as their personal property https://www.theiap.org/key-issues ">https://www.theiap.org/key-issue...
On July 29th, @HouseJudiciary held a bipartisan hearing to address Big Tech’s clear antitrust abuses.
They’re working on the report. This report is a key opportunity for us to see if @JudiciaryGOP is actually serious about holding Big Tech accountable:
https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1288510588721737728?s=21">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s... https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1288510588721737728">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s...
They’re working on the report. This report is a key opportunity for us to see if @JudiciaryGOP is actually serious about holding Big Tech accountable:
https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1288510588721737728?s=21">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s... https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1288510588721737728">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s...
https://townhall.com/columnists/mikedavis/2020/07/25/house-judiciary-republicans-must-oppose-big-techs-antitrust-amnesty-n2573122">https://townhall.com/columnist...
There’s no doubt a @JoeBiden- @KamalaHarris Administration would continue to coddle—and cheer on—Big Tech monopolists & their billionaire bosses, while these woke bullies censor & silence conservatives.
End:
1. Antitrust Amnesty
2. Section 230 Immunity
https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1292880618980700160?s=21">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s... https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1292880618980700160">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s...
End:
1. Antitrust Amnesty
2. Section 230 Immunity
https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1292880618980700160?s=21">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s... https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1292880618980700160">https://twitter.com/mrddmia/s...
