Dear ⁦ @jack⁩:

Why did ⁦ @Twitter⁩’s Censorship Department suspend conservative attorney ⁦ @Yoder_Esqq⁩’s account?

What part of his tweet below is false?

Dear @NickPacilio:

Were you behind @Twitter’s decision to suspend conservative attorney @Yoder_Esqq? https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harriss-former-press-secretary-is-twitters-top-censor/

Here were the pictures that @Yoder_Esqq posted:

For 10 years, I was a litigator in Colorado — and I have a lot of experience with issues involving elections.

If the primary voter didn’t receive a secrecy sleeve for the primary ballot, anyone can see from the outer envelope whether that mail-in ballot is R, D, or Unaffiliated.

Liberal Big Tech monopolists & billionaires think they serve as the ultimate arbiters of “truth”—our “protectors.”

Truly narcissistic & scary.

Even if you believe someone is wrong, how is it acceptable to censor?

And why is @NickPacilio, @KamalaHarris’s former aide, in charge?

Trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolies claim they need Uncle Sam’s coddling & protection from lawsuits, in the form of an out-of-date statute called Section 230 (from 1996).

And then these Big Tech bullies target & silence conservatives.

@The_IAP says it’s time to reboot Big Tech.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is outdated & contains corporate handouts, such that Big Tech profits from human-sex trafficking, revenge-porn, the opioid epidemic and drug addiction, terrorism, and other forms of human misery. Do conservatives support this?

Trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolies & their (liberal) billionaire bosses keep getting fatter

@The_IAP‘s fixes

1. End Antitrust Amnesty

2. Upgrade Sect 230 Immunity, so Uncle Sam doesn’t keep coddling Big Tech so they can censor conservatives

3. Personal data=personal property

Antitrust is both civil and criminal law enforcement.

Yes, LAW ENFORCEMENT — not regulation.

Do conservatives still believe in law enforcement?

Conservatives don’t believe in amnesty or Sanctuary Swamps, do they?

#EndAntitrustAmnesty

#DrainSanctuarySwamp

Big Tech is feeding chickens to the reptiles in the DC Swamp, to satiate the appetite for targeted antitrust enforcement against Big Tech’s most egregious actors. The amnesty & Sanctuary Swamp that Big Tech has bought is great for the ruling class, but not for the rest of America

Many “conservative” DC-establishment types and other insiders take handouts from the liberals running Big Tech — while taking pot shots at real conservatives who are fed up with Big Tech’s censorship and bullying.

1. Antitrust Law Enforcement — not Antitrust Amnesty

2. End Uncle Sam’s coddling of trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolies and their (liberal) billionaire bosses by upgrading Section 230 immunity

3. Treat users’ personal data as their personal property https://www.theiap.org/key-issues 

On July 29th, @HouseJudiciary held a bipartisan hearing to address Big Tech’s clear antitrust abuses.

They’re working on the report. This report is a key opportunity for us to see if @JudiciaryGOP is actually serious about holding Big Tech accountable:

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1288510588721737728?s=21 https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1288510588721737728

https://townhall.com/columnists/mikedavis/2020/07/25/house-judiciary-republicans-must-oppose-big-techs-antitrust-amnesty-n2573122

There’s no doubt a @JoeBiden- @KamalaHarris Administration would continue to coddle—and cheer on—Big Tech monopolists & their billionaire bosses, while these woke bullies censor & silence conservatives.

End:

1. Antitrust Amnesty

2. Section 230 Immunity

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1292880618980700160?s=21 https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1292880618980700160