1/ Are acute performance enhancements a result of post-activation potentiation (PAP)? Depends on your definition. "Classic" PAP has a muscle-based mechanism allowing optimum cross-bridge mechanics. In fast-twitch fibres it's necessary for forceful contractions when...
2/ activation is submaximal (it can't improve peak force), and for maximal RFD. Remember, it's not 'additive' but 'necessary'. And it's quick/easy to evoke - it's probably the commonest operating state of fast-twitch fibres and doesn't require more than brief warm-up to evoke.
3/ So if you provide a brief warm-up in clinic/sports, you won't need additional conditioning activities. It's quick to generate (within seconds) but also quick to reverse (half-life ~28 s), so performance enhancements seen minutes after activity cannot be explained by PAP.
4/ More importantly, based on current evidence, it appears to have a very small effect relative to other effects of warm-up (e.g. skill practice, muscle temperature) in complex human movements. So in studies reporting enhancement after funky conditioning activities, what are...
5/ we seeing? Most likely a temperature effect (muscle water may also contribute). But that doesn't mean that doing something 'funky' won't enhance performance above standard warm-up, although that's rarely shown in scientific literature. Our job is to find out how to do that...
You can follow @TonyBlazevich.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: