Yesterday, the blogger Anatoly Shariy published the full tape of the intercepted conversation uploaded by the Ukranian secret service SBU within virtually minutes as evidence that separatists shot down #MH17. https://lbry.tv/@DonbassInsider:2/sharyi-mh17-bezler-tape-en:2
The SBU shortened the conversation and dropped the essential parts. In addition, the SBU falsified the date of the conversation to give the impression that this conversation was about the shooting of #MH17.

The SBU original:
Interestingly, this SBU leaked audio confirms what Bezler said just one day after the shooting of MH17.
https://lenta.ru/news/2014/07/18/bezler/

https://www.interpretermag.com/ukraine-liveblog-day-153-russian-backed-separatists-move-bodies-of-flight-mh17-victims/#3466
And it reminds us that many "conspiracy theorists" like me "suspected" just that. In 2015, I wrote:
As proof of the authenticity of the recording, it would be sufficient that Bezler is no longer listed as a suspect in the Dutch investigation, even if the reason for this "change of opinion" was not shared with the public.
Nevertheless, ...
...with the publication of the video immediately voices arose whether this longer video might be a fake.
In this case, however, the proof seems quite simple.
The SBU part was cut out of a longer video in the middle of the sentence.
In other words, if the leaked audio was a fake, then parts of a conversation must have been added at exactly these positions. And that would most likely be visible. The characteristics of the noise, for example, would change. But it does not.
In other words, if the leaked audio was a fake, then parts of a conversation must have been added at exactly these positions. And that would most likely be visible. The characteristics of the noise, for example, would change. But it does not.
In other words, if the leaked audio was a fake, then parts of a conversation must have been added at exactly these positions. And that would most likely be visible. The characteristics of the noise, for example, would change. But it does not.
The same can be said for the end of the SBU version. The leaked audio shows no visible manipulation:
The same can be said for the end of the SBU version. The leaked audio shows no visible manipulation:
The same can be said for the end of the SBU version. The leaked audio shows no visible manipulation:
On the contrary, the SBU version shows a slight change in the noise just before the end, which appears as a bright spot. We see the same spot in the leaked version.
An X-Fade to make traces of edits indistinct would have made this spot disappear.
On the contrary, the SBU version shows a slight change in the noise just before the end, which appears as a bright spot. We see the same spot in the leaked version.An X-Fade to make traces of edits indistinct would have made this spot disappear.
On the contrary, the SBU version shows a slight change in the noise just before the end, which appears as a bright spot. We see the same spot in the leaked version.An X-Fade to make traces of edits indistinct would have made this spot disappear.
In other words, it looks very much like the leaked audio is authentic and not only confirms a long-standing assumption, but one can assume the same manipulative nature for other "recordings".
You can follow @MichaKobs.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
There are a lot of misconceptions about the Turkish diaspora in Germany. Since i just finished writing an essay about this topic I thought it's time to give other people
Read more
Las mejores calculadoras online en 2020A thread http://totumat.com/2020/11/26/las-mejores-calculadoras-online-en-2020/ Cuando se estudian asignaturas que requieren de cálculos complicados, nada mejor que contar con una buena calculadora.
Read more
Mitigating #ClimateChange is as much about taking up new techs as about leaving others behindMost studies focus on #coal's global downfall but another #energy tech decline is loomingRead my new
Read more