Read on Twitter
[Thread] Ever wonder how PFF grades stack up versus http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com in predicting PPR PPG?
After diving into the data with @DavidZach16 for RBs and WRs drafted in rounds 1-4 from the last 4 years, one thing is clear:
http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com > PFF Ranks >>> PFF Grades
![[Thread] Ever wonder how PFF grades stack up versus http://NFL.com in predicting PPR PPG?After diving into the data with @DavidZach16 for RBs and WRs drafted in rounds 1-4 from the last 4 years, one thing is clear: http://NFL.com > PFF Ranks >>> PFF Grades](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EfHLBibUEAAOsdX.png "[Thread] Ever wonder how PFF grades stack up versus http://NFL.com in predicting PPR PPG?After diving into the data with @DavidZach16 for RBs and WRs drafted in rounds 1-4 from the last 4 years, one thing is clear: http://NFL.com > PFF Ranks >>> PFF Grades")
After diving into the data with @DavidZach16 for RBs and WRs drafted in rounds 1-4 from the last 4 years, one thing is clear:
http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com > PFF Ranks >>> PFF Grades
RBs: http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com 
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="✅" title="Fettes weißes Häkchen" aria-label="Emoji: Fettes weißes Häkchen">
- http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com grades (39%) are LEGIT as they& #39;ve managed to beat out draft capital (36%) in predicting PPG
- PFF Grades are essentially usable at 4%
- PFF Ranks are better but still trails both http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com and draft capital
- http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com grades (39%) are LEGIT as they& #39;ve managed to beat out draft capital (36%) in predicting PPG
- PFF Grades are essentially usable at 4%
- PFF Ranks are better but still trails both http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com and draft capital
- http://NFL.com grades (39%) are LEGIT as they& #39;ve managed to beat out draft capital (36%) in predicting PPG- PFF Grades are essentially usable at 4%- PFF Ranks are better but still trails both http://NFL.com and draft capital" title="RBs: http://NFL.com https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="✅" title="Fettes weißes Häkchen" aria-label="Emoji: Fettes weißes Häkchen">- http://NFL.com grades (39%) are LEGIT as they& #39;ve managed to beat out draft capital (36%) in predicting PPG- PFF Grades are essentially usable at 4%- PFF Ranks are better but still trails both http://NFL.com and draft capital" class="img-responsive" style="max-width:100%;"/>
RBs: Top Grades
http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com :
1) S. Barkley
2) L. Fournette
3) D. Cook
4-T) A. Kamara, J. Jacobs, D. Guice, R. Jones
PFF:
1) K. Hunt
2) R. Jones
3-T) S. Barkley, D. Montgomery
5) D. Henderson
http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com :
1) S. Barkley
2) L. Fournette
3) D. Cook
4-T) A. Kamara, J. Jacobs, D. Guice, R. Jones
PFF:
1) K. Hunt
2) R. Jones
3-T) S. Barkley, D. Montgomery
5) D. Henderson
WRs: http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="✅" title="Fettes weißes Häkchen" aria-label="Emoji: Fettes weißes Häkchen">
- Correlations are much lower for WR for both
- DC is king (24%) but http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com is a close second (21%)
- PFF Grades are again unusable at 0%
- PFF Ranks are better but still behind both http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com and draft capital
- Correlations are much lower for WR for both
- DC is king (24%) but http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com is a close second (21%)
- PFF Grades are again unusable at 0%
- PFF Ranks are better but still behind both http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com and draft capital
- Correlations are much lower for WR for both- DC is king (24%) but http://NFL.com is a close second (21%)- PFF Grades are again unusable at 0%- PFF Ranks are better but still behind both http://NFL.com and draft capital" title="WRs: http://NFL.com https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="✅" title="Fettes weißes Häkchen" aria-label="Emoji: Fettes weißes Häkchen">- Correlations are much lower for WR for both- DC is king (24%) but http://NFL.com is a close second (21%)- PFF Grades are again unusable at 0%- PFF Ranks are better but still behind both http://NFL.com and draft capital" class="img-responsive" style="max-width:100%;"/>
WR: Top Grades
http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com :
1-T) DK Metcalf, C Ridley, M Williams
4-T) C Davis, J Ross, Hollywood, AJ Brown, P. Campbell
PFF:
1) Isabellahttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😬" title="Grimasse schneidendes Gesicht" aria-label="Emoji: Grimasse schneidendes Gesicht">
2) Gallup
3) JJAW
4) D. Westbrook
5) Z. Jones, J. Washington
http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com :
1-T) DK Metcalf, C Ridley, M Williams
4-T) C Davis, J Ross, Hollywood, AJ Brown, P. Campbell
PFF:
1) Isabella
2) Gallup
3) JJAW
4) D. Westbrook
5) Z. Jones, J. Washington
People often reference PFF grades but the data here shows they should be ignored entirely when it comes to RB/WR prospects.
PFF ranks fair MUCH better but they still trail both http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com and draft capital. Still though, Kudos to whoever does those. Big value add.
PFF ranks fair MUCH better but they still trail both http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com and draft capital. Still though, Kudos to whoever does those. Big value add.
I used to laugh off http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com until @DFBeanCounter first informed me of its value.
After digging in here, it& #39;s pretty clear http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com can be a powerful tool when used in combination with analytics.
The best part? It& #39;s free!
https://www.nfl.com/draft/tracker/prospects/">https://www.nfl.com/draft/tra...
After digging in here, it& #39;s pretty clear http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com can be a powerful tool when used in combination with analytics.
The best part? It& #39;s free!
https://www.nfl.com/draft/tracker/prospects/">https://www.nfl.com/draft/tra...
I& #39;m constantly looking for ways to incorporate film into my analysis cause I believe it& #39;s a key piece of the puzzle and I suck at it.
Until now, I& #39;ve relied on people with proven track records like @JetPackGalileo who publishes his grades for free! Follow him.
Until now, I& #39;ve relied on people with proven track records like @JetPackGalileo who publishes his grades for free! Follow him.
Going forward, it looks like I can add another informative FREE tool to my process and you should too.
Top 2020 rookies per http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com :
1) Lamb - 6.81
2) Swift - 6.78
3) Jeudy - 6.77
4) Ruggs - 6.72
5) Jefferson - 6.46
6) JT - 6.41
7-T) CEH, Akers - 6.39
Top 2020 rookies per http://NFL.com"> http://NFL.com :
1) Lamb - 6.81
2) Swift - 6.78
3) Jeudy - 6.77
4) Ruggs - 6.72
5) Jefferson - 6.46
6) JT - 6.41
7-T) CEH, Akers - 6.39
Again, special thanks to galaxy brain @DavidZach16 for helping with pulling this data together for the insights.
He just crossed 3k followers but deserves 5x that so make sure you follow him. Constantly putting out quality numbers driven analysis.
He just crossed 3k followers but deserves 5x that so make sure you follow him. Constantly putting out quality numbers driven analysis.
