More Transmania from the Guardian:

"feminism is a subcategory of human rights advocacy, which means, sorry, you can’t be a feminist if you’re not for everyone’s human rights, notably other women’s rights."

This is wrong on many counts... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/10/trans-rights-feminist-letter-rebecca-solnit">https://www.theguardian.com/commentis...

You can still be a feminist if you resist the demands of trans activists. Not all rights are in harmony - that is what trans activists wilfully ignore. The trans narrative is a fairy tale, claiming that women& #39;s rights and trans rights neatly align.

Trans inclusion is not, by definition, a feminist cause. After all, we are talking about male-bodied persons who claim that they belong with women. Fortunately, British law-makers insisted on exemptions which make it possible to exclude transwomen in certain contexts.

Current law in the UK doesn& #39;t shy away from the fact that changing the recorded sex on your birth certificate is based on a legal fiction. See here: https://theelectricagora.com/2019/10/14/legal-fictions-changing-sex-by-changing-gender/">https://theelectricagora.com/2019/10/1...

It would be useful for transgenderism if women believed that it is a feminist issue, but neither a label (trans woman), not a feeling, nor self-identifying as a & #39;woman& #39; makes you a woman. More is required: https://theelectricagora.com/2019/12/22/more-than-a-feeling-rock-stars-heroines-and-transwomen/">https://theelectricagora.com/2019/12/2...

What trans activists demand are not & #39;human rights& #39;. For example, they demand the right to take part in female-only sports. This is neither a right, nor a human right under current UK legislation, because fairness and safety in competition are more important than inclusion.