THIS.I have news for @SpeakerPelosi and @RepJerryNadler: the Obama administration banked on HRC winning in choosing to delay taking action against Russian election interference. In doing so, they actually helped alter *the very outcome their decision was based on* 1/ https://twitter.com/sethabramson/status/1292177352475246592

If there is ANYTHING that should be learned from 2016, it’s that you can’t make preemptive outcome-based decisions about protecting national security, because that decision itself affects the outcome! (See, e.g., Comey’s letter to Congress) Worse, if you gamble wrong 2/

you are exponentially weakened from taking action after said outcome, not only from a power but from a legitimacy perspective, because the natural question will be, “If it was so bad, why didn’t you do anything before the election?” Your INaction will be weaponized against you 3/

It’s a pretty standard part of law that you need to object when the action takes place, in order to stake and preserve your claim (in law, you can’t raise objections you never initially made on appeal). Why would you NOT document, for the record, the abuse of power by T & B 4/

to interfere with and impede, using both domestic and foreign devices, the integrity of very election on which you are relying on to return to our country’s principles? When Trump makes his power grab after Nov. 3, and *then* they object, it will be too late. END

P.S. The fact that Trump was impeached, even if not removed, over Ukraine will be the MAIN reason that Ron Johnson & The Kool Aid Mafia’s attempt at Ukraine/Biden 2.0 from being effective. Impeachment exposed and neutralized, to a very large degree, this disinformation op