Reupload because I accidentally deleted the wrong tweet:

As someone who supports BLM, support BIPOC, their businesses, their platforms, has donated, and signed and shared several petitions/fundings for BIPOC and their rights. Has gone to every protest I can- (1/?)

-and has been physically harmed for doing so. And, has shared tons of petitions for nintendo to expand their content to support BIPOC more than just whites, I will still sign and share stuff regarding star trees being taken away. (2/?)

Why? Because people are allowed to be upset about world problems/issues, as well as be upset about a game. A lot of us do keep that same energy, but yall are ignoring it, and acting as if we don't. No, I'm not saying their's people who aren't ignoring stuff regarding (3/?)

BIPOC, BLM, and the like while retweeting and singing the petition for the star trees. But if you're really going to block me for supporting my feelings about a game, you shouldn't be following me in the first place. (4/?)

I'm not going to block you because your opinions are different than mine, or because I don't want you to send me something. Worse case I'll unfollow you, which is what I'm doing right now to a lot of people, because I'm not going to just wait to be blocked by you- (5/?)

-for expressing my opinion towards the star trees matter. In no way am I comparing what BIPOC go through to loosing an item in a game. Do I think the petition is over doing it? No, not really because people petition for what they want all the time. (6/?)

It's a good way to get nintendo to see what people want, when a lot of people sign, in one organized place. Hence why I also signed and shared the petition for nintendo to cater more towards the BIPOC community that plays their game. (7/?)

In short, if you don't like what I have to say please unfollow me. I don't see a point in us being mutuals, if you're just going to block me for being upset about both. (end of thread.)