I heard some BIG FAT WHAMMIES today during the Sally Yates testimony.

Let's review;

First off, why is Lindsay Graham covering for Yates and saying he believes she didn't knowingly sign bad FISA warrants...
To trap her?
Or further that stupid hack lie that's been disproven?

Now I'm gonna turn your attention to an article that came out in Aug 2017 about this nonsense.
The Russia Hack?
Was a fairy tale spun by crowdstrike
The metadata in the files showed the files transferred too fast for an over the internet hack and had to be downloaded from source

Read this

And, by the way the people saying LEAK not HACK? Are some of the preeminent Intel community experts in this subject

Read this article you need to see what it says https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

It's important to note that while not all the folks at VIPS agreed?

William Binney, the man who was technical director for the NSA?

Was pretty clear in his assertion that the metadata indicated leak and source download. Not hack

Here...I did a big dirt dig on the topic of leak vs hack and crowdstrike involvement in the whole 'hack" story along w/ Seth Rich tie ins
You really need to check this thread out. The hack narrative from the DNC -Russia Did It - has not been proven. At all https://twitter.com/WPatriot2/status/1176906332991098880?s=19

Crowdstrike never turned over what they had to be checked out

The "hack" story was just screamed & screamed, but the DNC & crowdstrike would not cooperate with independent reviews or turn over the server.

Too bad for them the NSA likely has copies too

I got another BOOM,too

Take a look at this:
What Seth actually uncovered was massive money laundering

Have a look at this thread:
This is why the hack lie was being pushed. And why they wouldn't turn over the servers.

The DNC was laundering foreign donations thru their PACS https://twitter.com/WPatriot2/status/1195727713815945218?s=19