I came across the latest @eu_eeas blog post by @JosepBorrellF only today
It's really a must read on #China
Tho clad in diplomatic language, it's a geopolitical
that would have been unthinkable just few months ago
Few takeaways in this thread (1/14) https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/83644/China,%20the%20United%20States%20and%20us
It's really a must read on #China
Tho clad in diplomatic language, it's a geopolitical

Few takeaways in this thread (1/14) https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/83644/China,%20the%20United%20States%20and%20us
1st key quote:
"US-China strategic rivalry will probably be the dominant organising principle for global politics" regardless of who the next US president is
May sound obvious to political analyst, but framing
relations like this was never straightforward for 
(2/14)
"US-China strategic rivalry will probably be the dominant organising principle for global politics" regardless of who the next US president is
May sound obvious to political analyst, but framing



(2/14)
2nd passage:
"As for Europe, we need to be clear where we stand" and be guided by our "values and interests"
Nothing new here. But it goes on:
"This does not mean we should be equidistant from the two protagonists"
And here, it starts getting real
(3/14)
"As for Europe, we need to be clear where we stand" and be guided by our "values and interests"
Nothing new here. But it goes on:
"This does not mean we should be equidistant from the two protagonists"
And here, it starts getting real

(3/14)
@JosepBorrellF continues:
and
are "political cousins", "committed to political pluralism, individual rights, media freedom and checks and balances"
"The combination of this shared history and shared values creates, a priori, a close affinity between us"
(4/14)


"The combination of this shared history and shared values creates, a priori, a close affinity between us"
(4/14)
On the other hand,
is a whole different cup of tea - as it was "built on values and a political regime that are very different" from Europe's
And here we come to the true turning point...
(5/14)

And here we come to the true turning point...
(5/14)
...
"the economic development of China and the growth of its middle class has not resulted in a marked evolution towards democracy", @JosepBorrellF says
"The idea of ‘convergence through trade’ has disappeared"
BOOM 
(6/14)
"the economic development of China and the growth of its middle class has not resulted in a marked evolution towards democracy", @JosepBorrellF says
"The idea of ‘convergence through trade’ has disappeared"


(6/14)
A little context to appreciate the magnitude of this:
"Convergence through trade" roughly equals the German expression "Wandel durch Handel" - "change through trade"
It's the official
government stance towards
and it was recently defended by @peteraltmaier himself
(7/14)
"Convergence through trade" roughly equals the German expression "Wandel durch Handel" - "change through trade"
It's the official


(7/14)
Is "Wandel durch Handel" just wishful thinking?
As @Doranimated argues in the excellent piece below, "the theory's exclusive focus on economics" may have shadowed other "factors - cultural, political, and demographic - of equal or greater weight"
(8/14) https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articles/china-middle-eastern-kingdom
As @Doranimated argues in the excellent piece below, "the theory's exclusive focus on economics" may have shadowed other "factors - cultural, political, and demographic - of equal or greater weight"
(8/14) https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articles/china-middle-eastern-kingdom
Illusion or reality, "convergence through trade" was also the
line on 
Is it still so? Reading @JosepBorrellF, we doubt it:
"People respect China, but many also fear it" - "the idea of a mighty, benevolent power is fading" - China has become "somewhat friendless"
(9/14)


Is it still so? Reading @JosepBorrellF, we doubt it:
"People respect China, but many also fear it" - "the idea of a mighty, benevolent power is fading" - China has become "somewhat friendless"
(9/14)



In


Yet...
(10/14)
Yet, Brussels and Washington share "a number of deep concerns on the substance of Chinese behaviour that must be addressed"
... and
is losing patience:
"[D]espite Chinese commitments", "there is insufficient follow through"
(11/14)
... and

"[D]espite Chinese commitments", "there is insufficient follow through"
(11/14)
In the final passage, @JosepBorrellF is explicit:
there is a "China challenge" that is part of a wider "rise in authoritarian powers"
"like-minded democracies" need to step up their cooperation to fend them off
and
should be "at the heart of this effort"
12/14)
there is a "China challenge" that is part of a wider "rise in authoritarian powers"

"like-minded democracies" need to step up their cooperation to fend them off



12/14)
Let's be clear
If the EU follows through with what this article argues, it would be a major turning point in its China policy
From an approach of "convergence through trade" to a policy of confrontation and perhaps containment
(13/14)
If the EU follows through with what this article argues, it would be a major turning point in its China policy

From an approach of "convergence through trade" to a policy of confrontation and perhaps containment
(13/14)
And let's not forget the timing of this publication
There's still a trade deal being negotiated between
and 
And guiding @EUCouncil there's now Germany, which has so far being quite permissive toward China
But perhaps times are a-changin'
(14/14) https://www.politico.eu/article/why-post-merkel-germany-will-change-its-tune-on-china/
There's still a trade deal being negotiated between


And guiding @EUCouncil there's now Germany, which has so far being quite permissive toward China
But perhaps times are a-changin'
(14/14) https://www.politico.eu/article/why-post-merkel-germany-will-change-its-tune-on-china/