Do you like open science and reproducible research? 🤔 Of course you do. You should read this thread.

#openscience #rstats #academia #linguistics #phonetics
I taught a graduate course (Spring2019) on open science and reproducible research for linguists 🤓. The goal was to teach students in our SLA/Bilingualism PhD program about open science and the tools used to do reproducible research.
I wanted the course to be practical for students w/ limited programming exp. so they would finish feeling like more independent researchers and also be beneficial in the sense that they would walk away w/ something tangible, i.e. conf pres
I believe replication studies are particularly beneficial for pedagogical purposes, a position advocated by @TimoRoettger and Baer-Henney in https://doi.org/10.3765/pda.v1art4.13
We decided to do a conceptual replication of a study in the journal Cognition, extending it to a new pop. (adult L2 learners)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.021
We contacted the authors of the study we planned to replicate (ht Kalim Gonzales and @Krista_BH) and were able to get the original stimuli used in their experiment 🤝.
We learned about the replication crisis in Psychology (and agreed it's likely much worse in #Linguistics 🙀) and some tools being used to make research more transparent. Here's a great video on the topic:
Together we went through the previous lit and then drafted a pre-registration using #github and #OSF.
It was an ideal opportunity to learn the basics of #Git as well as some ins and outs of scientific collaboration. 🤗
Students learned about the preparation needed in the experimental design stages in order to complete a #prereg. We thought about our statistical analyses, power/sample size, stopping rules, etc.
We built the experiment using open source software, #PsychoPy3, and ran it online via #pavlovia and @gitlab
We finished collecting the data halfway through the semester and carried out our statistical analysis. We then began writing up a manuscript using #papaja in #Rmarkdown (ht @FrederikAust)
We were able to present preliminary results and got great feedback from @kleinschmidt and some of the members of his lab 🤜🏽🤛🏼
It was a bit tight, but we finished the manuscript by the end of the semester and submitted it for publication on the last day of class 😅 We also submitted abstracts to two conferences.
The paper was under review for a little over a year 🤬, but we also uploaded a pre-print to @PsyArXiv and got some helpful feedback at a later stage (ht @TimoRoettger).
In the meantime we presented at the two national conferences. For some of my co-authors this was the first conference presentation for their CVs. The slides were HTML documents prepared using #xaringan in #Rmarkdown (ht @xieyihui)
Here comes the happy ending 🥳: in June (2020) the paper was accepted for publication!
Congrats to all my co-authors (I believe @Crislocrispis is the only one on twitter) and thank you to Kalim Gonzales, @Krista_BH, @TimoRoettger, and @kleinschmidt.
Looking back on the whole process now, I am extremely happy with how everything worked out 👍🏽. I am planning on doing a replication study like this every time I teach this grad class.
My main takeaways: doing a replication study with a class takes a lot of work, but is worth it, it's good for science, and it's good for grad students. 10/10 would repeat. 👊🏽
You can follow @jvcasill.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: