The @bounce_finance website is easy to use and a novel concept.

Unfortunately, some auctions resemble old ebay scams.

This title advertises 4 $BOT per ETH (0.166 ETH/BOT), but the details actually show the bidders are getting 6 MTA per ETH (paying $65 for $5 tokens)
$BOT

Another $BOT scam:

This one offering B0T (zero not O)

$BOT scammers adapt. This time with the right name, but obviously, not the right address.

Devs should color code the right $BOT contract or include some address visualization with a commonly used token index.

Someone less lazy than me should total up how much $ETH was scammed.

cc @bounce_finance

THIS IS THE ONLY $BOT CONTRACT ADDRESS PEOPLE

0x5bEaBAEBB3146685Dd74176f68a0721F91297D37

Really should grab the image for the token etherscan generates, even if autogenerated (until the team can udpate with logo) would help users immensely.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x5bEaBAEBB3146685Dd74176f68a0721F91297D37

Obviously this is alpha/use at your own risk platform but adding visualizations gives users tools to better use the platform while maintaining decentralization.

$BOT creator says "Defi has to embrace scams" tho... https://twitter.com/jack_venture/status/1291117113235521536

A fake ICO! The real $GEEQ lists tomorrow and all rounds are sold out

Just eyeballing it, the majority of the listings are fake tokens.

DYOR and decentralization by all means!

However if "defi has to embrace scams" and you distribute your governance tokens to users of the network, who ends up running that protocol?

Decentralization can be a great feature if you get the incentives right, but incentivizing spamming a marketplace with useless and fraudulent listings? That ain't it chief!

$BOT

Only spending the time on this thread because the potential of Bounce is so great and I really do want to see it work.