Read on Twitter
Sally Yates just testified that she would not have signed off on the surveillance of Carter Page if she knew what she knows now. That follows Rod Rosenstein saying the same thing. https://jonathanturley.org/2020/06/04/rosenstein-slams-mccabe-obstruction-theories-and-1000-prosecutors/
...Yates also confirmed that the Logan Act was raised in the meeting with President Obama on Flynn. Yet she stated that the concern was that the Trump national security adviser had undermined the Obama Administration by encouraging them not to retaliate.
Yates said that you could say that Comey "went rogue" in ordering the Flynn interview. Yates is struggling with the Logan Act issue since Flynn was speaking as the NS adviser who was coming into office in less than two weeks. Comey reportedly said the Flynn meeting was "legit."
However, Yates legitimately objected to the interruption of her efforts to answer. This is precisely what happened in the Barr hearing and both parties use this tactic. In the meantime, some of us would like to hear answers to these important questions. https://jonathanturley.org/2020/07/31/the-barr-hearing-and-the-triumph-of-small-people-in-an-era-of-great-events/
