hongrui 02
today’s tutorial, ping mentioned about combining two concepts to get the best of both worlds (the water bottle analogy) to solve the problems caused by the bottle, and honestly it just got stucked in my head. Combining two features could solve problems... #be1112 (1/)

...and also create a new set of problems too. When applied to architecture, if we keep on adding features and solutions to solve a problem, a new problem will always rise because no design is perfect. This got me wondering, when should we be satisfied with a design? (2/) #be1112

is architecture just a journey of adding solutions while creating problems? so are all buildings considered incomplete just because they have flaws. i know ping also mentioned about the water bottle annoying him only during some days... (3/) #be1112

so how do we decide on whether we should further modify or finalize a design? (/4) #be1112