Listening to last episode of casualinference podcast

@EpiEllie makes a point that Chris Booth makes to me often privately.

That Twitter and podcast discussion of journal articles is terrific but 10 yrs it will be disconnected from the paper...

The flawed conclusions will not be corrected.

I struggle with this bc they are right.

I spend a lot of time reading to prep for @Plenary_Session discussions of articles, but in a year it will be lost from the paper

Lately with the help of trainees. We have tried to write some of these as commentaries, but publishing is uphill battle

Letters to editor are laughably short, as is window to submit. As @EpiEllie
Notes

What are solutions?