Pretty good overview of China& #39;s statist thinkers. But it underestimates how much the Party integrates Marxist views of power with this theoretical toolkit.

Fortunately, Palladium has some navigation-grade theory for @nytimesworld and our readers. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/02/world/asia/china-hong-kong-national-security-law.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/0...
Why is it so important that the Party understands this structure? It is the key to the "rejuvenation of the Chinese nation."

From @sysimmolator: Jiang and co have framed their project as part of this overarching goal in the CCP& #39;s justification for rule. https://palladiummag.com/2020/02/05/jiang-shigongs-vision-of-a-new-chinese-world-order/">https://palladiummag.com/2020/02/0...
When reading Chinese political theory, it& #39;s striking how often it defies what the West sees as dichotomies: state/markets, sovereignty/internationalism, and so on.

Perhaps this reveals that such dichotomies are more the product of ideology than understanding our institutions.
China does not share these ideological commitments. In order to understand how the Party leadership approaches its goals, we need to understand how they see the world.

Perhaps we will learn something about the secrets of America& #39;s own success in the process.
You can follow @palladiummag.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: