1/ No he has not. As @A_SJamal correctly pointed out, there was errors in the writings of the Urdu. As proof of this, I will quote from the forward from pg. xxvi. https://twitter.com/alislamtribune/status/1290040755948408835">https://twitter.com/alislamtr...

2/ As proof that Malfuzat sayings are not on the same level as the books of the Promised Messiah (as), the scholars appointed by Hadhrat Muslih Ma& #39;ud (ra) have stated that all the literature surrounding Mirza Ghulam Ahmad are divided into 4 categories of authenticity:

3/ You will not find a single book directly written by the Promised Messiah (as) that supports your view, and if so, I challenge you to quote it. You challenged us to provide us with a quote written by him, but we both know, he has not. So no need.

4/ https://twitter.com/alislamtribune/status/1290336200390324229?s=19

Why">https://twitter.com/alislamtr... for 20 years one states there is no death for false prophethood by human means, and then finally, he says the opposite to please a mullah? That is not a good tactic since they would still hate him. Do you realize how ridiculous your logic is?

5/ https://twitter.com/alislamtribune/status/1290336527034265600?s=19

Sarcasm">https://twitter.com/alislamtr... is not going to save you from your ridiculous claims. There is no pseudo-"apologetics" here. The same scholar who compiled these works under Muslih Ma& #39;ud also stated the authencity level. The only one foolin around is you.

6/ Next time, think Outside the Box, okay, Mr. @alislamtribune ? Pun intended.