Breaking: Bleeding Fool lies again! https://twitter.com/bleedingfool/status/1288934927954857989

This evidence free hit piece begins with the totally real author saying they have totally real evidence somewhere! This will be proven to be a complete and utter lie.

We’ll get to the “massive crime” in a minute, but they first have to regurgitate their previous lies and take a tweet denouncing their lies as “proof” that their lies are true.

They take some time to bash Alex de Campi for... making a reasonable statement considering the number of comic “pros” who have been revealed to be shitty people. In fact, most of this fucking bullshit article is a recap.

It’s also a free advertisement for this YouTuber, who is a willing yet completely disposable shield and club for CG to use against their enemies and to be tossed aside when she outlives her usefulness.

Anyway, we get to the article’s actual target: Stephanie Cooke. For the crime of being a woman in comics, Bleeding Fool is about to slander her name with a... “massive crime”.

The crime in question: Bill Willingham was missing some money and blamed it all on her.

Yes, the “massive crime” is one based entirely on “he said, she said”, since Bill Willingham’s only proof that she did anything was... Bill Willingham.

Sure, Bleeding Fool half-heartedly tries to say she did it, but their sources, most (who are more than likely not real) are unnamed, while the only one they COULD name was Mimi Cruz.

I cannot stress this enough, the ENTIRE CASE rests entirely on Bill Willingham’s source, which is... Bill Willingham.

Anyway, why is the writer trying so hard to defend Bill Willingham? Because of this:

And also this: https://thegeekwhisperer.com/2009/01/11/comics-politics-screw-you-bill-willingham/amp/

And also this:

I don’t know whether or not Cooke actually embezzled any money from Willingham, but the case is clear that the only reason Bleeding Fool is targeting Cooke is because she’s a woman and they can’t have that!

Ok, one other reason: she’s got a book coming out.

Incredibly, Bleeding Fool finds a conspiracy in the fact that the case (based entirely on a case of he said, she said, mind) was not reported on. Because... uh... Alex de Campi.

Yes, that’s their entire reason for believing the case was censored.

The whole thing is so fucking ugly and hateful. Like this part right here, where they openly misprepresent Cooke’s tweets as saying “public accusations are shitty”. That’s NOT what she was saying, in fact: she was hurt that his immediate reaction was to blame her.

You see it in the article: “How dare a woman not shut up and take a false accusation?”

I’m going to point out that according to Bleeding Fool, the “Whisper Group’s” supposed target is Scott Snyder, based on a bunch of tweets that are taken out of context. “Penny Parker” is a fucking liar, and needs to be sued for libel.

TL,DR: Bleeding Fool is covering for Conservative Bill Willingham, who baselessly accused Stephanie Cooke of embezzling money even though he literally couldn’t figure out how much was actually missing and had to guess and his entire source for this was entirely his word vs. hers.