Mega thread :- of So called Quranic variants(according to his pseudo definition)which doesn't matter to us. We shall explore and disect through books written by actual great classical scholars centuries and centuries ago explaining this socalled variants: https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275627934712303616
1/
Note:- we shall go through every single examples he brought forth all forty, First:- I will debunk the myth of so called modern Qurans which is absolutely baloney, because this two Qirah were mass transmitted going back to Prophet and I will providing sources and references
Note:- we shall go through every single examples he brought forth all forty, First:- I will debunk the myth of so called modern Qurans which is absolutely baloney, because this two Qirah were mass transmitted going back to Prophet and I will providing sources and references
I will be^
18/This example also falls under 3rd category that is complementary+simple elementary level grammar which our mufti allama grammarian dongol failed to comprehend and has no change in meaning whatsover: https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275636375761620993
The verse is الله او لله connected with previous verse where it says من which is ادوات الشرط عاقل lets see what Imam Abu Ali Farisi and Al Qurtubi said:-Those who recite الله with ا is because there is no ل" حرف من حروف الجر " with من hence the response came الله with ا
And Muslims/classical scholars throught the history for 1,400 years believed and accepted this two be valid,authentic and correct revelation from God almighty. Secondly, this example falls under the 2nd category which I mentioned that it is repeated in the Quran in other place:
In other place in Surah Luqman verse 12 without هو. Now lets see what Classical Scholars like Ibn Al Jawziya and At Tabari said about this:-
They said both of them are correct,valid(مصيب) and authentic
They said both of them are correct,valid(مصيب) and authentic
6/
This shows our mufti Allama sheikh Abdullat Dongol is swimming in sheer ignorance of Arabic language and blunder which even not a elementary level student would make this example of omission of و falls under first category that is ادوات العطف https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275628333045370880
This shows our mufti Allama sheikh Abdullat Dongol is swimming in sheer ignorance of Arabic language and blunder which even not a elementary level student would make this example of omission of و falls under first category that is ادوات العطف https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275628333045370880
It doesn't change the meaning at all! Rather و is conjuction in Arabic language somewhat similar to fanboys in english grammar let's read what Imam Abu Ali Al Farisi said as Imam Al Qurtubi quoted him in his tafsir:-
As for the Qirah who recites with منهما(dual plural)this is connected to very first verse 31 where two gardens(جنتين)/مثنى/dual plural is mentioned. This beautiful and reconnilatory explanation was Imam Abu Ali Al Farisi.
Was given by^