Read on Twitter
Mega thread :- of So called Quranic variants(according to his pseudo definition)which doesn& #39;t matter to us. We shall explore and disect through books written by actual great classical scholars centuries and centuries ago explaining this socalled variants: https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275627934712303616">https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/...
1/
Note:- we shall go through every single examples he brought forth all forty, First:- I will debunk the myth of so called modern Qurans which is absolutely baloney, because this two Qirah were mass transmitted going back to Prophet and I will providing sources and references
Note:- we shall go through every single examples he brought forth all forty, First:- I will debunk the myth of so called modern Qurans which is absolutely baloney, because this two Qirah were mass transmitted going back to Prophet and I will providing sources and references
I will be^
18/This example also falls under 3rd category that is complementary+simple elementary level grammar which our mufti allama grammarian dongol failed to comprehend and has no change in meaning whatsover: https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275636375761620993">https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/...
The verse is الله او لله connected with previous verse where it says من which is ادوات الشرط عاقل lets see what Imam Abu Ali Farisi and Al Qurtubi said:-Those who recite الله with ا is because there is no ل" حرف من حروف الجر " with من hence the response came الله with ا
And Muslims/classical scholars throught the history for 1,400 years believed and accepted this two be valid,authentic and correct revelation from God almighty. Secondly, this example falls under the 2nd category which I mentioned that it is repeated in the Quran in other place:
In other place in Surah Luqman verse 12 without هو. Now lets see what Classical Scholars like Ibn Al Jawziya and At Tabari said about this:-
They said both of them are correct,valid(مصيب) and authentic
They said both of them are correct,valid(مصيب) and authentic
6/
This shows our mufti Allama sheikh Abdullat Dongol is swimming in sheer ignorance of Arabic language and blunder which even not a elementary level student would make this example of omission of و falls under first category that is ادوات العطف https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275628333045370880">https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/...
This shows our mufti Allama sheikh Abdullat Dongol is swimming in sheer ignorance of Arabic language and blunder which even not a elementary level student would make this example of omission of و falls under first category that is ادوات العطف https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/status/1275628333045370880">https://mobile.twitter.com/XGONDALX/...
It doesn& #39;t change the meaning at all! Rather و is conjuction in Arabic language somewhat similar to fanboys in english grammar let& #39;s read what Imam Abu Ali Al Farisi said as Imam Al Qurtubi quoted him in his tafsir:-
As for the Qirah who recites with منهما(dual plural)this is connected to very first verse 31 where two gardens(جنتين)/مثنى/dual plural is mentioned. This beautiful and reconnilatory explanation was Imam Abu Ali Al Farisi.
Was given by^
