Read on Twitter
Fractal Thought Complexity Dynamics
A thread exploration of Schooling as a framework for explaining the definition, architecture, and construction of a parallel concurrent complexity system in order to induce fractal thinking and extradimensional thought.
It& #39;s gonna be wild. https://twitter.com/Cantide1/status/1276267487278116864">https://twitter.com/Cantide1/...
A thread exploration of Schooling as a framework for explaining the definition, architecture, and construction of a parallel concurrent complexity system in order to induce fractal thinking and extradimensional thought.
It& #39;s gonna be wild. https://twitter.com/Cantide1/status/1276267487278116864">https://twitter.com/Cantide1/...
Parallel Complexity Systems Construction
Each "part" of the system (input, evaluat system, output) must be understood not just at object level but complexly. Most important is *systemized* understanding of each part.
Implication and Interaction, Conceptual Referencing are *key*
Each "part" of the system (input, evaluat system, output) must be understood not just at object level but complexly. Most important is *systemized* understanding of each part.
Implication and Interaction, Conceptual Referencing are *key*
Schooling as a Complex System
Student. Home vs Public vs Private. Outcome.
One input complexly understood, Three systems complexly understood, "One" outcome complexly understood.
Conceptual definitions and referencing are the key to framework and concurrency
Student. Home vs Public vs Private. Outcome.
One input complexly understood, Three systems complexly understood, "One" outcome complexly understood.
Conceptual definitions and referencing are the key to framework and concurrency
A student has many parts and interactions with schooling. Building a systemized understanding will increase the overall complexity of "student" as a concept itself. The key is to define and maintain held terminology and internal systems that will be changed by school itself.
Important to note that it is not just the intellectual understanding of "student" as a complex concept that is needed. It is a fractal and self-referential understanding. Each concept contained in "student" must reference another part of "student". It must be self-contained.
Key to creating a "complex systemized understanding" of a concept is: break it down into fundamental, smallest parts, then building it back up as a complex, self-referential framework, creating a solid whole, that
literally feels more "solid" than an intellectual "known" factoid
literally feels more "solid" than an intellectual "known" factoid
"Student" has many parts. The rigidity of boundaries and parts is key to creating a proper structure. Not all properties are needed, not all data is important. Stay conceptual, not factual/numerical. Build a design, a concept, not an object.
Rules of rigidity and boundaries, cutting of superfluous info, also apply to the complex systems themselves. When building, focus on inputs and outputs, transformations, interior self-referencing, as well as exterior systems/concepts -referencing.
Important to note each "part" must be stand alone. It is not connected to other systems, it is its own system, interacting with other systems, maybe being transformed by them, but always enclosed unto themselves.
"Student" is not an object, but a system. This is counterintuitive
"Student" is not an object, but a system. This is counterintuitive
The "student" system is transformed by the "schooling" system and results in a new "student" system state.
The key to tracking transformation is permanence vs fluidity. Parts of the "student" may change, but itself is still the same larger whole.
The key to tracking transformation is permanence vs fluidity. Parts of the "student" may change, but itself is still the same larger whole.
Defining a complex transformative system is comparable to input system construction. Break down to fundamentals of inputs, transformations, outputs. Focus on higher level view, not individual example data. Maintain self-referencing boundaries and enclosure.
A complex transformative system will unfold from the characteristics and concepts contained within the input system. This is the result of linear progression from input to system to output. Fractal complexity is contained in each of these three nodes, bounded.
The "result" part of the Parallel Concurrent Complexity System is the same in framework and shape as the input, but transformed, sometimes re-conceptualized, but still referential to the input and the transformation systems themselves.
Conceptual constancy and throughput is key
Conceptual constancy and throughput is key
Finally, with all the introductory craziness and definitions out of the way, I& #39;ll start to define the system itself and put it together. Normally all this happens on paper, rather quickly, as the implications unfold in my mind from the concepts I write down, frameworking itself.
"Student" parts
-Socializing
-Intellect
-Values
-Credentials
It& #39;s easy to see how each category can explode in its own complexity. This is good. As well, each category references and influences the others in subtle ways. This is self-referential complexity creation.
-Socializing
-Intellect
-Values
-Credentials
It& #39;s easy to see how each category can explode in its own complexity. This is good. As well, each category references and influences the others in subtle ways. This is self-referential complexity creation.
Each of the three "schooling" systems has ways in which it will transform not just the 4 main parts of "student" but also the sub-parts *and*(!) the implications of the cross-referential influences of the "student" parts themselves.
This is transformational systems complexity.
This is transformational systems complexity.
*The key to extradimensional thinking is what happens from this point forward*(!)
As each concept start to gain complexity as a standalone system, all the way down to the sub-sub-concepts (which are still systems) a nested framework of systems forms...the mind starts to expand.
As each concept start to gain complexity as a standalone system, all the way down to the sub-sub-concepts (which are still systems) a nested framework of systems forms...the mind starts to expand.
As the complexity and solidity of each node increases a fractal shape is formed, from "student" to "socializing" to "friends"...a NEW fractal shape is being formed, this one the direction I just made...a linear progression of adjacent concurrent parallel referential tesseracts.
As the complexity and solidity of each node increases a fractal shape is being formed, from "student" to "schooling" to "adult"...a NEW fractal shape is being formed...a linear progression of "fractal input, fractal transformation system, fractal output."
It is the nesting of a fractal inside another fractal resulting in an even larger fractal that starts to ramp up the total volume of complexity being held in the mind at one time. This requires more vibrational frequency and energy as it reaches out in *extradimensional space*(!)
The singular cascading resonance of a fractal residing inside another transformational fractal is only the first step of Higher Extradimensional Thinking.
From here on is where the magic happens, as rigid, permanent structures in the 4th dimension are accessed.
From here on is where the magic happens, as rigid, permanent structures in the 4th dimension are accessed.
Taking a single fractal input and copying it, then running it through multiple parallel transformational fractal systems, then recombining it...is the ultimate key to Higher Extradimensional Thinking.
This is mathematically provable. Sets of sets.
https://twitter.com/Cantide1/status/1250933320181067784?s=20">https://twitter.com/Cantide1/...
This is mathematically provable. Sets of sets.
https://twitter.com/Cantide1/status/1250933320181067784?s=20">https://twitter.com/Cantide1/...
From here it is up to you. You have to define, study, find, and create your own fractal shapes. Can use pre-defined like the one I made, but "knowing" is not "understanding." Write it down. Study it.
Stay linearly adjacently referential.
Talk to yourself https://twitter.com/Cantide1/status/1251584032573358087?s=20">https://twitter.com/Cantide1/...
Stay linearly adjacently referential.
Talk to yourself https://twitter.com/Cantide1/status/1251584032573358087?s=20">https://twitter.com/Cantide1/...
Any and all questions/comments welcome at any point of this thread. This is a very complex process that is describing even more complex parts. Linearizing parallel complex simultaneous thoughts is not ideal but is the limitation of the world we live in.
