Read on Twitter
"The retroactive change would mean an additional 376 test-takers passed, according to the state bar." @StateBarCA @CaSupremeCourt @LorenaSGonzalez @AsmMarkStone @Rendon63rd @AsmReyes47 @AsmShirleyWeber https://www.law.com/therecorder/2020/07/24/lower-bar-exam-passing-score-retroactively-law-deans-and-students-urge/">https://www.law.com/therecord...
Allowing these 376 diverse professionals to gain #retroactiveadmission won& #39;t open the floodgates in CA but will lessen the burden of grading 14,000 exams come Oct. Give these applicants the ability to practice what they truly love.
By scoring above a 1390 on the #cabarexam, these 378 applicants are competent to practice law in 48 states (now 49 with CA& #39;s new cut score). We are willing and able to provide legal advice to the public. Let us start now. @atlblog @lawprofblawg @breakingmedia @SCOTUSblog
@GavinNewsom @ericgarcetti @NancySkinnerCA @toniatkins @ScottWilkCA @BenAllenCA @SenateHertzberg @MariaEDurazo Please support us to gain #retroactiveadmission under the new cut score which would require those who objectively passed to retake it. This unjustly affects minorities.
@ACLU @ACLUSoCal @ACLU_NorCal @Matt_Cagle Please read this thread and help us to advocate for #RetroactiveAdmission. Retroactivity has been given in Montana a few days ago after lowering their cut score. Help us achieve the same result in CA.
@AmericanLawyer @bloomberglaw @businessinsider @latimes @sacbee_news @CourthouseNews @NationalJurist @ABAJournal Please spread the word about this grave injustice. Time and time again repeaters who scored 1390+ are not allowed to share their story. Give us a voice to be heard.