1) Why is @Wikipedia biased & #antiHindu?
Ans: Wikipedia’s mission is to summarize "accepted knowledge" from “reliable source”. Inconvenient facts are not part of “accepted knowledge” or published by so-called “reliable source”.
2)Anyone can edit Wikipedia?
Ans: No. Wikipedia has 4 levels of bureaucracy: Administrators, Bureaucrats, Supreme Court & Stewards ABSS. ABSS promotes group think, in-group favoritism & hostility to inconvenient facts. Only ABSS approved opinion is allowed @wikipedia
Q3. What is “accepted-knowledge” & “reliable-source” @wikipedia?
Ans: ABSS decides who is reliable-source and what is accepted-knowledge. Wikipedia editor's decided that @anuragkashyap72 is "reliable source"; So, @TheJaggi & @SwarajyaMag are black-listed: https://twitter.com/anuragkashyap72/status/1233346460890148864
Q4. Do @wikipedia rely on facts or experts?
Ans: No. As per Wikipedia, “2002 Gujarat Riots” meet "legal definition of genocide" b'cos Desi Deva a book on S. Asian American women declared it "genocide". Book has 0 reviews on amazon & has nothing to do with riots. @Gujaratriotscom
Q5. Does @wikipedia rules like "neutral pov", "5 pillars", "reliable source" etc apply to ABSS?
Ans: No b'cos ABSS is the judge, jury & executioner. Any dubious sources (eg. Desi Deva) supporting ABSS agenda is deemed neutral & excellent source like @SwarajyaMag are deemed biased
Q6. Can @wikipedia article camouflage as propaganda tool?
Ans: Yes. ABSS misuses power. For example, "2002 Gujarat riots" page peddles "genocide" propaganda by using anchoring effect, dubious source & power of repetition (article is peppered with words like genocide, pogrom etc).
Q7. Can @wikipedia article camouflage as attack page?
Ans. Yes. "2020 Delhi riots" page was started as attack on @KapilMishra_IND. It repeated words "Mishra" 16times & declared him lead figure responsible for 11deaths & 170injuries. ABSS loved it& placed it on wikipedia home page
8) A big thread by @Soumyadipta exposing working of wikipedia #AntiHinduWikipedia:- https://twitter.com/Soumyadipta/status/1235098631738281984
9)How #AntiHinduWikipedia work? Steps:
1)Let's depict guj riots as genocide
2)Search for a convenient source failed
3)Search harder after few months
4)Found a new book on S. Asian American Dance by Prof of Gender Studies
5)Hooray! 2002 guj riots meet legal definition of genocide
10) Wiki Editor MSGJ,recipient of 13 wiki awards, declared that 2002 guj riots meets legal definition of genocide because page#123 of a dance book with 0 reviews on amazon says so. There is no way to verify what's on page#123. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2002_Gujarat_riots&type=revision&diff=573135942&oldid=572746663
https://www.amazon.com/Desi-Divas-Political-Activism-Performances/dp/161703732X
You can follow @DataReveals.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: