Read on Twitter
I get that when some people first hear about "censorship of pro-life voices", they question it. "Can it be true? Maybe they just don't know how search engine optimization works, maybe the videos just don't get that many clicks, maybe they're overplaying their hand"...1/7
So you test it out. Go Youtube "What is an abortion". The top findings are all from pro-abortion outlets, AMAZE, Buzzfeed, Planned Parenthood, Vice... videos that show the baby as a blob, a dot, etc. 2/7
. @LiveAction has the largest following online in the prolife arena, over 4M. Our abortion procedures videos have gathered almost 200 million views. We used to be in the top search results. Then a Slate reporter emailed Youtube bc she didn't like that. 3/7 https://slate.com/technology/2018/12/youtube-search-abortion-results-pro-life.html
But don't take my word for it....Look at what she said she saw *before* she whined to Youtube for showing a medically accurate animation of the abortion procedure: 4/7
She got the results changed!
"I emailed YouTube Friday afternoon asking why anti-abortion videos saturated the search results for 'abortion,'...By Monday morning, before the company got back to me, the search results had changed." 5/7
"I emailed YouTube Friday afternoon asking why anti-abortion videos saturated the search results for 'abortion,'...By Monday morning, before the company got back to me, the search results had changed." 5/7
She wrote her piece on Dec. 21. By Dec. 23 videos from Live Action were far beyond the *150th video*to be seen. Dec. 23 @benshapiro's various videos were found behind at least 40 others. 6/7
Now if you search for our videos by their *exact title* they still won't show up...7/7
