Read on Twitter
A THREAD
explanation of the claim we got, im gonna try to say it in the easiest way possible , please rt so people can see that
LETS GO!! (1/?)
explanation of the claim we got, im gonna try to say it in the easiest way possible , please rt so people can see that
LETS GO!! (1/?)
FIRST. what exactly counterclaimant means?
Counterclaimant is a type of claim ,IT IS A RESPOND to another claim or opposition to the order for payment in writ proceedings,opposition to the default judgment,
or the charges against the payment order in the writ proceedings,but(2/?)
Counterclaimant is a type of claim ,IT IS A RESPOND to another claim or opposition to the order for payment in writ proceedings,opposition to the default judgment,
or the charges against the payment order in the writ proceedings,but(2/?)
i think the first thing would be more realistic
but who knows.okay so like The Code of Civil Procedure allows for two situations in which a counterclaim can be like even filed. (3/?)
but who knows.okay so like The Code of Civil Procedure allows for two situations in which a counterclaim can be like even filed. (3/?)
1.Claim of the heir for the issue of the inheritance - a claim of the owner of the subject of the estate for payment of a reserved share
2.Claim for delivery of goods AGAINST the owner - a claim for reimbursement of expenditure made by the owner. (4/?)
2.Claim for delivery of goods AGAINST the owner - a claim for reimbursement of expenditure made by the owner. (4/?)
so like i guess they (1d/modest/simon??) used the second reason , cuz it makes sense.
SECOND. what Third party Plaintiffs means?
It doesnt necessarily have to be a specific person. Rather, it is about an unlimited set of people. (5/?)
SECOND. what Third party Plaintiffs means?
It doesnt necessarily have to be a specific person. Rather, it is about an unlimited set of people. (5/?)
Despite the fact that they(one direction or probably simon/modest) were bound by an agreement with one of the entities,so like third party plaintiffs always depends on the situational and legal system and the relations between the parties yk (6/?)
simplified, it can be said that third parties are all those who are not legally bound by the civil law relationship between other entities??:)
on those pics , we know that those third party claimants have priority in US to use mark , ONE DIRECTION
SO (7/?)
on those pics , we know that those third party claimants have priority in US to use mark , ONE DIRECTION
SO (7/?)
this counterclaimant concerns the mark , one direction, and ?its a claim towoards people that sued? (8/?)
THREE.
so the juice is:
boys are demanding for jury to like, consider giving them the rights for the name "one direction" once again but for them them not some modest , to continue the international use of the mark in commerce. and they are ready to discuss every possible thing+
so the juice is:
boys are demanding for jury to like, consider giving them the rights for the name "one direction" once again but for them them not some modest , to continue the international use of the mark in commerce. and they are ready to discuss every possible thing+
which means they "demand a trial by jury of all issues triable to a jury".
WE DONT KNOW IF THOSE PAPERS ARE R E A L.
SO PLEASE, don't believe in this so fast , its just !!IF it was real!!
AND im not a lawyer , i was just reading a lot;)
WE DONT KNOW IF THOSE PAPERS ARE R E A L.
SO PLEASE, don't believe in this so fast , its just !!IF it was real!!
AND im not a lawyer , i was just reading a lot;)
Okay so ,it really can relate to the situation of 2012!!
It's really likely to be like that ,
BUT https://twitter.com/i_am_ilwH/status/1286834064360722432?s=19
It's really likely to be like that ,
BUT https://twitter.com/i_am_ilwH/status/1286834064360722432?s=19
Thanks to @parisianarchive
We can know that , they were sent some paper to Renee the whole trademark on the TWO patents.
These under (thank you again for those) were sent in 2019/20. So far it seems that only one confirmed the patent/trademark again was
the 1D LOGO
We can know that , they were sent some paper to Renee the whole trademark on the TWO patents.
These under (thank you again for those) were sent in 2019/20. So far it seems that only one confirmed the patent/trademark again was
the 1D LOGO
You can look up trademarks justia and search "one direction" , then you should find few under
1D limited!!
Thank you against
@parisianarchive
1D limited!!
Thank you against
@parisianarchive
