Read on Twitter
Ok Oak haters here we go:
1 I DARE you to watch my videos and tell me they are poor quality.go for it. Yes, they feature a talking head. Because I talk from my head. Like other humans.
https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/bursting-the-education-bubble/
1 I DARE you to watch my videos and tell me they are poor quality.go for it. Yes, they feature a talking head. Because I talk from my head. Like other humans.
https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/bursting-the-education-bubble/
2 differentiation...what type? I'd like to see anyone "differentiate" a *remote* video for *students you don't know* better. Good luck chief. In fact check out my video here for an example of how we tried to get around that https://twitter.com/adamboxer1/status/1257633488901111809?s=19
3 God grant me the confidence of someone who thinks that teaching 16% of schools is bad performance. That's like a zillion kids. FFS.
4 I love how we are denigrating Oak and lionising Bitesize. Do you think Bitesize did all that work for free? Someone paid for it! YOU paid for it! Was there a tender? No? OH MY GOD SWEET HEAVENS BITESIZE ARE IN ON IT TOO
5 seriously throughout this the haters have been clutching at the flimsiest of straws. It's getting to the stage where charitable readings of their behaviour are close to impossible.
6 to my mind, Oak is one of the greatest education achievements of the last 50 years, up there with researchED, project follow through and the like.
7 if you're against:
Less workload for teachers
More resources and choice for students
Teachers just getting on with it
Then what are you for?
/done
Less workload for teachers
More resources and choice for students
Teachers just getting on with it
Then what are you for?
/done
