Thread on my writings and affiliations.

1. First up, I'm nationalist, pro Hindutva and strongly support transfer of temples to their owners. I want Hindu rule in India and a ban on the communist parties. I want Ghar Wapsi done asap to save India's future.

2. I see that a lot of readers love my articles in which I show Nehru's crimes against India, Islamic loot of Hindu temples, British induced famines, genocide by Islamic invaders, importance of Brahmins in freedom movements from 2,300 years ago to the present.

3. But as a journalist, I have an investigative bent of mind. When I see truth buried, my instinct is to bring it out. So when I say only 10% of Kerala Hindus benefited under the kings while the vast majority lived like slaves, why is everyone so upset?

4. If the rule of the kings was so great, why did communism become so attractive to everyone in Kerala, including Brahmins? Reason was abject, grinding poverty. Can you deny communists introduced land reforms? Large estates up to 90,000 acres were subdivided and given to tenants.

5. Can you deny the members of the Nayadi community had to maintain a distance of 72 feet from the Namboodiris? If he came closer, the punishment was death. He could not use the main roads and had to use side roads to go places. Pulayas had to keep 64 feet distance.

6. How could all these communities become wealthy or even become middle class if they had no right to even walk on public roads? Didn't this condemn 90% of Kerala people to a permanent living hell on earth?

7. Why do you believe me when I write Feroz Shah Tughlak threw a feast each time his soldiers killed 20,000 Hindus, but you question my sources that say Kerala kings gave upper caste status to Christians, Muslims and Europeans while condemning majority of Hindus as untouchable?

8. You can't have one and not the other. As a journalist, I have an investigative, curious bent of mind. When I see facts buried, my instinct is to bring them out. Facts may be unpleasant and they may not fit our narrative but sweeping them under the carpet is counter productive

9. Hindus, especially from Kerala, must accept the crimes of the previous generations against our own people. If you support Black Lives Matter why is it so hard to see that the majority of people under Kerala kings were only slightly better off than blacks in the USA?

10. At a time when Peacefuls are preparing to take over Kerala and evangelicals are converting, Hindus must bury the hatchet. A solution is to have Chief Minister from each group by rotation. If this is in the too hard basket, you'll know what real hardship is under sharia.
Ends