[tw: animal abuse]

been seeing zoophiles shit up my TL lately, i guess in response to Harvest Moon Howl Fest proactively banning them. remember that whatever zoos try to say is in support of one goal: to justify their abuse of animals as socially and legally permissible. thread:
this shit should be handled the same as other despicable ideas, such as nazi ideology - shut it down instantly. in the best case they will drain your time and energy in arguing, in the worst case they will sway impressionable people who don't clearly understand why this is wrong.
[tw: animal abuse]

first, here's why they're wrong: animals do not understand and cannot clearly communicate consent and thus are incapable of granting or revoking it. sexual contact with an animal is abuse. that's it, end of story. so whatever they say, do not forget this.
but second, let's contradict their arguments anyway.

"Zoos helped build this fandom. Without zoos, the furry fandom wouldn't exist."

a) this is a common abuser justification in many fandoms. in reality the vast majority of furries are not zoophiles, and yet the fandom exists.
b) there is nothing intrinsic to the furry fandom that necessitates animal abusers to operate. we don't need them.
c) yes, there are zoos that do participate in community building within the furry fandom. but by their nature they are making it WORSE, not better. kick them out.
"Anthro furry porn is just as zoophilic as feral furry porn."

a) feral porn is bad because it normalizes zoophilia. yes, even if your feral characters are sentient; that's no different than "uhh actually this 1000-year-old vampire just LOOKS like she's 12".
[tw: CSA]

b) this is like saying all porn of adults is like depictions of CSA just because adults and children have features in common. feral porn symbolizes zoophilia in a way anthro porn does not.
"Zoophilia is practiced by some indigenous peoples, your exclusion is colonialist."

uhhh what the fuck??? even if the first statement were true (haven't seen evidence posted with that argument) it doesn't make it okay, don't use SJ language to defend your abuse
"The furry fandom is supposed to be tolerant."

being an animal abuser is not equivalent to being, say, LGBTQ. zoos may be a minority group but they are not oppressed -- this abuse should not be tolerated.
in short this behavior cannot be tolerated and every furry space that boots out zoophiles is correct to do so. animal abuse is reprehensible and the people who advocate it are wasting your time and energy by regurgitating their horrible ideas.
[tw for earlier in thread: animal abuse, CSA]

end of thread. if i phrased any of this poorly this please let me know. if you are a zoo who sees this stop your awful shit immediately and get help, you do not need to continue. apologies if the TWs didn't help, twitter sucks.
You can follow @vrcryptid.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: