A thread on Politics and Media

The orthodoxical power repudiates any criticism made for their divulged ambiguous forged data which befuddles the voters who are concerned about the pervasive & inescapable pace of joblessness.

@ARanganathan72 @ShashiTharoor
@Iyervval

Any criticism to the iconoclastic doesn't tantamount to treason. The power must be erudit enough to satisfy one's incredulousness towards governmental issues. The nation's present financial crisis are symptoms of a more profound malaise.

An accountable citizen would only spit reality and truth does far less harm than insular complacency. And every answer isn't just about tantalizing the opposition by juxtaposing '55 months Vs 55 years' with your unauthentic and counterfeit data.

As that is solipsism and for me that also is an act of opprobrium.
We encountered ample opportunities for hand-wringing about axiom bias on media as they garble the story. The media is pathological in either their mendacity or in their self deception.

Thus, its credibility has vitiated over the past years. Why the media house doesn't create a stage to debate on rejecting doctrinaire approach and open to unwavering ideas, no matter where on the political spectrum they originate from?

Why we hear more of an irrelevantly aggravated talk between Mulla's and Pakistani's and not any picturesque conversation between acuminate intellects? Do they enjoy more of vitriolic phrases like 'Anti-national' or 'Pakistan Jao' or are trepidated from the duress of the power?