Since its inception, #ecocriticism has generally assumed that environmental literature (and other media) has a positive effect on its readers. But the truth is that we just don’t know how environmental literature affects most people, or specific communities of readers.
That’s why we need empirical ecocriticism: an empirically grounded, interdisciplinary approach to environmental narrative. Empirical ecocriticism combines social scientific and humanistic methodologies to examine the influence of environmental texts on their audiences.
The kinds of questions that empirical ecocriticism might explore revolve around the central questions that ecocriticism has been interested in since its origin, which are increasingly urgent at this moment of climate emergency, mass extinction, and global pandemic:
📗 How can environmentally engaged narratives contribute to the transformation of attitudes, behavior, culture, infrastructure, policy, and politics that is now undeniably necessary?
📗 How do the assumptions and intuitions of ecocritics align with empirical evidence about what narratives do when they encounter real people? What other questions might empirical studies generate and then help us explore?
To the extent that these are key concerns of many scholars involved in #ecocriticism today, we hope that this cluster marks the beginning of a vibrant tradition of empirical ecocriticism. To read the entire cluster, learn more or get involved, go to http://www.empiricalecocriticism.com .
You can follow @schneidermayers.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: