There’s an important health care issue that is (understandably) flying under the radar: certificates of public advantage (COPAs), which are grants of antitrust immunity for hospital mergers conditional on active state regulation.
Thread
That’s basically the idea behind COPAs: the state places conditions on a hospital merger (e.g., limit price increases, maintain quality, improve access, etc.) and, in exchange, the merging hospitals get antitrust immunity, so federal enforcers can’t challenge them.
What are the long-term effects of hospital mergers shielded from antitrust enforcement with COPAs? We studied three COPA-protected hospital mergers from the 1990s/2000s.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3634577
The evidence is mixed on their effectiveness: some COPAs were effective in constraining prices, others were not.
However, all but one of the COPAs from the 1990s/2000s are no longer in effect, leaving unregulated hospital systems with market power. After COPAs are removed, prices spike, in some cases by 20-40%.
While the evidence on quality is more limited, it suggests that COPA-protected mergers also lead to reductions in the quality of care.
Overall, states should carefully consider the risks of higher long-run prices and reduced quality when thinking about the use of a COPA.

End Thread
You can follow @cjrhgarmon.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: