Some people work really hard to misunderstand &/or misrepresent gendercrit. Our view is simple. 1) SEX exists & is morally neutral; we need to retain words for female people (girls/women) & male people (boys/men). 2) SEXISM is bad, let& #39;s stop that.

It really does seem like an awful lot of PhDs either do not understand the difference between sex & sexism, or think that sexism just *naturally arises* from the existence of sex, so feminism requires we all pretend sex doesn& #39;t exist.

It& #39;s breathtakingly absurd.

"GCs/Radfems want to dominate people, they want to limit expression, blah blah." We& #39;re saying the opposite: men should be allowed any personality, & women should be allowed any personality, & the only reason that& #39;s not currently the case is that male supremacy requires otherwise.

But we& #39;ve been explaining this for years & years, & still they lie about us. Therefore it& #39;s hard to dismiss as a good-faith misunderstanding. I think it& #39;s more of a conscious decision to support male supremacy in its new rainbow sparkle guise, whether from cowardice or greed. https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤷🏻‍♀️" title="Achselzuckende Frau (heller Hautton)" aria-label="Emoji: Achselzuckende Frau (heller Hautton)">