1/ People will often scold scientists who opine on the intellectual bankruptcy of critical theory.

"A biologist's take on CT is as irrelevant as a biologist's take on particle physics."

No, CT's apparent complexity is purposefully designed to embellish very simple absurdities.

2/ Despite what they'd have you believe, it does not take a great mind to understand critical theory and why it is epistemologically unsound.

Looking at CT's foundation it becomes obvious to any competent scientist that it is totally incapable of producing real knowledge.

3/ I would like to ammend the above tweet and replace "any competent scientist" with "any thinking human".

This stuff isn't difficult! Once you start pulling at any of its strings, it all starts to unravel.