1/ People will often scold scientists who opine on the intellectual bankruptcy of critical theory.
"A biologist& #39;s take on CT is as irrelevant as a biologist& #39;s take on particle physics."
No, CT& #39;s apparent complexity is purposefully designed to embellish very simple absurdities.
"A biologist& #39;s take on CT is as irrelevant as a biologist& #39;s take on particle physics."
No, CT& #39;s apparent complexity is purposefully designed to embellish very simple absurdities.
2/ Despite what they& #39;d have you believe, it does not take a great mind to understand critical theory and why it is epistemologically unsound.
Looking at CT& #39;s foundation it becomes obvious to any competent scientist that it is totally incapable of producing real knowledge.
Looking at CT& #39;s foundation it becomes obvious to any competent scientist that it is totally incapable of producing real knowledge.
3/ I would like to ammend the above tweet and replace "any competent scientist" with "any thinking human".
This stuff isn& #39;t difficult! Once you start pulling at any of its strings, it all starts to unravel.
This stuff isn& #39;t difficult! Once you start pulling at any of its strings, it all starts to unravel.