Read on Twitter
Maybe it's just me, and maybe I'm wrong, but a lot of us were all Googling who she was when she married Harry. If she had her own platform, (honestly!) good for her, that's awesome, I would love to see it... wherever it is. Or wasn't it deleted entirely before she wed Harry?
I think (IMO), for such an event, there are thousands of uber fantastic women in their own right that would better suit, for the lack of a better word. It's the "in their own right" bit that I'm concerned with, as I believe it's her association which is getting her the place.
Ask a young woman who Meghan is, and they'll automatically place and associate her achievements with Harry.
Harry and Meghan. Meghan and Harry.
It's "them", not "her".
And that's fine, but perhaps misplaced at such an event to empower a young women as the sole, whole unit.
Harry and Meghan. Meghan and Harry.
It's "them", not "her".
And that's fine, but perhaps misplaced at such an event to empower a young women as the sole, whole unit.
I can think of loads of impressive, independently successful boss ladies, from an artist, to an author, to an annoyingly marvellous stuntwoman, whom - I gather - never waited or wanted for a prince to clinch it for them.
Those are the women deserve to be elevated on that stage.
Those are the women deserve to be elevated on that stage.
*the women THAT deserve...
Been watching too much french drama.
