Read on Twitter
PSA: If you see you are no longer following me and I’m no longer following you, once again I’ll remind everyone: it wasn’t Twitter. It was me. It’s called a soft block and it’s because I have issues with something you said or something you support....1/6
Not everything is a conspiracy and not everyone wants to hear the same shit you keep trying to sell. If you are pushing a political agenda I don’t support: I’m just saying “I’m not interested”. And to my new followers...2/6
Thanks but I’m not a radfem or GC. I don’t use those labels for various reasons. If someone wants to have a serious question in good faith as to why, that is fine. And as to Amy Dyess...3/6
I and several people have blocked her for several reasons. In her article she shared the name and screenshots of someone I care about who has been getting bullied at the moment. I didn’t like that....4/6
..And she is continuing to bully anyone who doesn’t seem to agree with her on every little issue. No one told her she wasn’t “valid”. But you can’t claim you support women “leaving a toxic cult”...5/6
...And then turn around and name those women when they take issue with something you said. That is morally corrupt. So if she wants to share DMs between her and I: I don’t care. You won’t get the whole story from one screenshot. End. 6/6
Oh: I forgot. Amy used the term “race mixing” and would tag me as her “token black friend”. I found that term highly offensive and I’m no one’s pawn.
Right here. “Race Mixing”.
Now if you aren’t from the US, you might not understand why that is an off putting phrase. I have only heard it used by white supremacists and people who have issues with people dating other ethnicities
