Hey @martinparrfdn Would you agree that men disguising themselves to take secret pics of 'prostitutes' (Parr's words) because they have already refused to be photographed is a safety issue? That women's concerns for their own safety should be taken seriously?
And that a man who encourages this dangerous and misogynistic way of working should not be a trustee of a charity set up to promote photography?

Do you think the Charity Commission would have an opinion on that?
Parr's own words:

'It is very exciting to see this new energy and direction. This wonderful set of photos makes a positive contribution to a developing trend'.

Abusive photographic practise towards vulnerable women = 'a positive contribution to a developing trend'.
Parr is the artistic director of @BRSphotofest. How is a man who encourages this way of working even allowed near a photo festival? What do the sponsors say? The terrific @tracymarshallE is the director of the festival. She previously worked on @209Women. Problem anyone?
https://twitter.com/nataliekeyssar/status/1281605355718488064
I didn't want to link to it but a few people have asked so the work and Parr's intro can be found here. Note the only person the photog looks out for is a driver whose number plate is blurred in this kind of upskirt shot. Women are identifiable: http://txemasalvans.com/work/the-waiting-game/
Parr was chair of judges in the @MagnumPhotos comp when they picked photos of a child sex slave about to be gang-raped. To take and distribute a photo like this in the UK would be a criminal offense. But Parr gave her rape on camera an award.
The pursuit of women who say no to being photographed is not cunning @martinparrfdn.

It's predatory.
I think this is known as form https://twitter.com/duckrabbitblog/status/1282705921710477313
You can follow @duckrabbitblog.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: