A destruction of arguments against Direct Daygame THREAD, so listen up:
I’m going to list the arguments against direct daygame, and obliterate them all.

#1 “You give your power away”. Wrong, because when u strike up a conversation w/ a hot girl in the daytime, she’s gonna

Think you’re hitting on her regardless. Indirect daygame advocates don’t give women’s social intuition enough credit here. The only difference is if you go direct, you’ll perhaps get points for bravery, and you’ll waste less time. Not to mention, just because you’ve gone direct

Doesn’t mean you have to have the frame that she’s already won you over!

2) “Going direct forces her to make a snap judgment on you, and decide if she wants to date you w/o you getting a chance to display your personality”. Wrong, because once you go direct, you immediately

to stack onto a less direct/normal topic of conversation. The direct is just an honest way to start the convo

3) “indirect is better for Uglier/shorter guys” Wrong, because let’s think about this: what makes you think a girl is gonna want to deal w/ some ugly guy stopping her

on the street and rambling about a pet store, the time, directions, an opinion opener ect...She won’t. At least, if you’re less attractive & go direct that confidence increases your attractiveness, and she knows what you want. Furthermore, looks are subjective anyway

4) “indirect offers plausible deniability” Mostly wrong, because the moment you transition off of your indirect, she’ll know your true intentions, and perhaps ask if your indirect opener was contrived(it’s happened to me.

Some addendums-

Direct is easier to have a “buyer” frame, which I Love.

Direct is an easier way to stop girls on the street/big city

It’s important to note, situational openers are just as good, if not better than direct, but must be organic, and spontaneous.