2/ Scientists don't actually 'know' what lies much further beneath, than they can drill down to.

The structure of our Earth's core as taught is actually not irrefutably proven - it's consitution is only theorised as:

Crust, Mantle, Outer Core, Inner Core

Questions, eh?
3a/ Under what conditions does a magnetic field arise?

a.) Bulk of an object's dipoles at atomic level, aligned to the centre of the mass (incommensurable and non-Cartesian point - hence, if you break a magnet in two, you now have 2 centres of mass and 2 magnets - ad infinitum)
3b/

Or;

b.) Induced perpendicular to the flow of an electrical current (See: Right-hand rule). The strength and spatial affects of the magnetic field correlate directly with the strength of the electrical current.

This is a conjugate relationship.
4/ We're taught that the Earth's core behaves like a dynamo.

However, no attention is given to the huge energies received by all of our system's planets from the sun via Birkeland plasma currents, which can induce planetary Aurora at BOTH magnetic poles.

Hmmm....
5/ The motion of what is not even proven to exist at the core of ours (or any) planet, can generate such a strong and stable field?

We have 400 years of magnetic data, and not much else to go on at a global level. And some volcanic samples which confirm local fields in the past.
6./ The ESA SWARM mission initial mission output, showing the rate of change of the field, from 2000 to 2015.

This is showing intensity variations as measured from space.

Looks pretty, eh?

Field strength is neither homogeneous nor constant.
7/ They often like to alarm with variations on this graphic showing the wandering of our magnetic north.

But the pole doesn't exist on the skin of a planet, does it now?

It is an arbitrary measurement of an exit 'position' for a field convergence at the surface.

Nothing more.
8/ And they've only been keeping records on this curious phenomena for a little over a century.

Ignoring however many billion years of unknown that came before their PHD's, and special interest research grants.

They wouldn't want you to know too soon, that actually....
9/ The magnetic fields of planetary bodies are induced by the current distributed from star(s) at the centre of their solar 'systems' (within the heliosphere).

Those without atmospheres (electrical double layer) have a much weaker & less stable field.
11/ Did they forget that the Earth precesses and that magnetic North should NOT be expected to remain in a fixed location on the surface?

Measurement is of little value across the timescales they have been measuring....
12/ What if they were to teach you about how our solar system & planets really work?

Might this let the cat out of the bag on energy abundance everywhere?

Nikola Tesla. Wardenclyffe. JP Morgan.

As would acknowledging the electro-gravitic craft developed throughout the 20th C?
13/ A century of robber barrons exploiting the best intentions of Capitalism for their own ends, has kept this knowledge from the masses.

It has driven us down a blind cul-de-sac, well off the route to wisdom for the benefit of mankind.
14/ There is cause for optimism though, after the swamp has been drained.

DJT's uncle John G. Trump had access to Tesla's work and I'm pretty certain that this is not a coincidence.

We know what was publicly said, but what is held privately?

#TheGreatAwakening
END/ This thread may not appeal to many, but I felt irritated at seeing yet another of these pole-shift doom-monging articles, and I know the kind of fools in the fringe that will just lap this up to create FEAR amongst their audiences and more $'s.

#Counterpunch
You can follow @WokeAnonQ.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: