Read on Twitter
The Guardian on the Manchester City ban thread:
- Two emails hacked and leaked from Man City, apparently out if context
- UEFA decided their investigation 3-4 days early without even finishing it, getting clear evidence or seeing the email its self
- Two emails hacked and leaked from Man City, apparently out if context
- UEFA decided their investigation 3-4 days early without even finishing it, getting clear evidence or seeing the email its self
- The Gurdian believes the desicion was already made (consciously or unconsciously bias) already once the leaks came out following UEFAâs statement and a sanction was already intended
- UEFA never saw or asked for the full emails to begin with or at all
- UEFA never saw or asked for the full emails to begin with or at all
- The sponsorship of the owner through etihad is apparently false due as apparently reports stated that the government funded etihad, not mansour.
- There had been zero evidence mansour funded etihad to fund man city
- There had been zero evidence mansour funded etihad to fund man city
- The hacker, Pinto has leaked footballer info before such as cassilas making claims which was later to be proven false
- The hacker never released the full email
- The hacker never released the full email
The Guardian is incredibly reliable on investigations even football. There has also been questions raised by the source that UEFAâs ban was more political reasoned.
