Soon after publication, Nate Stephenson (not on Twitter? YET!) got in touch.

THEY found:
1) tree TAXONOMY was the dominant control on mortality trends
2) height was only important in SOME species.

They responded with a rewrite of earlier work:
https://go.nature.com/2O04ZQI 

3/n
Fascinating!

How can we reconcile risk from taxonomy and tree height during drought?

Instead of just defending our original article, we decided to add a totally NEW analysis of our ~1.8 MILLION trees!

4/n
FIRST: we matched our ~1.8 trees to the USFS FIA forest type map.

In total the 40,000 ha area had 10 forest types.

In each we asked: does mortality increase with height?

5/n
WE FOUND:

STRONG mortality-height trend in ALL 10 forest types!

6/n
Why did our results differ from the Comment on our original article?

We think plot-based forest sampling may be limiting our ability to capture landscape mortality trends.

So, we tested that too!

7/n
We used our original dataset to make 1000 forest plot simulations of the EXACT random sampling scheme from the Matters Arising.

What we found was surprising....

8/n
Mortality rate estimates from plot-based methods can vary by more than 50%!!!

Variability is mainly coming from:
1) plot placement
2) not enough large tree observations

9/n
If we zoom into a single forest type we see that mortality increases with tree height (red line).

BUT plot based estimates (black) are WAY too variable to reliably estimate this subtle LANDSCAPE-scale trend.

10/n
A MAJOR problem with UNDERsampling the full landscape is a tendency to UNDERestimate mortality, especially in large trees that are rarely seen.

We would need ~1100 plots in our study area to capture only 10 trees ~60 m tall!

11/n
Solution?

Plot-based methods of capturing forest mortality rate NEED to be augmented with remote sensing!

Otherwise, we will not capture the TRUE landscape-scale mortality trend.

12/n
Does height affect tree mortality during drought??

💯%!!

Does taxonomy matter?

💯%!!

Are they mutually exclusive?

***NO! They are interactive!***

13/n
"We argue in favor of a broad height-mortality trend that is interactive and modulated by species-specific factors. Drought-induced tree mortality is controlled by a complex series of interacting stressors—not by a single binary factor"

14/14

#scicomm https://go.nature.com/2ZKeBEF 
You can follow @StovallAtticus.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: