We talked about Hattie’s use of the term “effect sizes” in class last night and I woke up still annoyed by this ridiculous “zone of desired effects” image 1/10
…but it’s not about “liking” large effect sizes or not. It’s about whether we believe these are plausibly causal effects 4/10
The “zone of desired effects” is built on a lie. Correlation is not causation. Causal effects in education are simply not this large. 6/10
Correlation evidence is not bad in and of itself! It can point us in the direction of promising interventions. But in a time when we're facing budget cuts, it would be really beneficial to know which programs *cause* improved student outcomes 7/10
There are lots of more rigorous meta-analyses out there. I checked out a few, and came up with this. There are things that work! But the effect size is NEVER as large as Hattie’s “zone of desired effects” 8/10
This next school year is going to be extraordinarily difficult, and I hope that we bring strong evidence to address the challenges we face. 10/10
You can follow @cara__jackson.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: