LOOK: Lawyers led by Atty Howard Calleja and Bro. Armin Luistro from the De La Salle Brothers physically file petition vs Anti-Terrorism Act before the Supreme Court. They filed by email Saturday which Atty Calleja says has been acknowledged by SC. | via @mikenavallo

LOOK: Atty. Howard Calleja and Bro. Armin Luistro hold a copy of their filed petition vs Anti-Terrorism Act. | via @mikenavallo

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman is the second person to question the constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act. His representatives filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition with SC this morning. | via @mikenavallo

Lagman asks for a temporary restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction to stop implementation of and nullify the entire Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020. | via @mikenavallo

Far Eastern University College of Law Dean Mel Sta. Maria files 3rd Supreme Court petition vs Anti-Terrorism Act. His co-petitioners are FEU Law professors. | via @mikenavallo

In a press release, FEU Law Dean Sta. Maria and FEU law professors argue definition of terrorism is vague, sec 25 and 29 of ATA legitimizes warrantless arrests based on mere suspicion and encroaches judicial power. They also claim violation of academic freedom. | via @mikenavallo

LOOK: FEU Law Dean Mel Sta. Maria with co-petitioners Atty Eirene Jhone Aguila and Atty Michael Tiu show filed copy of 3rd SC petition vs Anti-Terrorism Act. | via @mikenavallo

Sta. Maria and FEU Law professors filed a petition for certiorari and Prohibition with prayer for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Injunction. Says facial challenge (without alleging actual injury) allowed in free speech cases. | via @mikenavallo

LOOK: Makabayan lawmakers file 4th petition against Anti-Terrorism Act before the Supreme Court. | via @mikenavallo