Im going to say it now.
I do not believe that JK rowling is well intentioned at all.

And neither is any other public figure in the lines of posie parker or any other "gender critical" figure.
The game plan is to say you simply have "concerns" while implying trans people are sexual deviants and a danger to children.

Pick out the worst of your own detractors and cry that you are being harassed for simply being concerned.
You let people like glinner take the mask off and be openly hateful so when they get banned you can say that your radically against the system and people like you are being shit down for simply speaking the TRUTH
Then you say you arent transphobic you have the backing of real trans people who havent been taken in by the "dogma" of the trans lobby.

Then @DebbieHayton @FionneOrlander or somebody with similarly low self respect runs defence for you.
But these quotes never see the public eye.
And the debbie's and fionnes of the world never challenge them either.
The gender critical cause is championed by politicians like @joannaccherry and the recent rollbacks or gender recognition laws by the tory party and they still find a way of making themselves out to be a victim.
The narrative they are driving is clear and it is harmful.

Rowling is not "concerned" she is using a façade of concern to facilitate anti trans sentiment.
I would be interested to hear what the people involved in the #IStandWithJKRowling hastag actually think about this.
You can follow @TransOffender.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: